If theists understood "evidence"

[Amarok]

Ah Roads trying the "gospels were written early argument " no they weren't they were written within a lifetime of the supposed events and not by eyewitnesses .

---

This seems like the same response I have gotten when asking similar questions of atheists claims that theists just need to be educated or lack critical thinking .   It's appears (to me) to be nothing more than sophism, and a way to disparage others, without any real solid backing or reason for the claim.   As usual, the result is just senseless attacks on Christianity, with nothing to support it.   I wonder if that fits under the prime directive rule?

Or is this just a reflection of your failure to hook any fish and your whiny persecution complex

---

Do they use reason and arguments to do this, or is it more just feelings?

Reason .It's theists who use feels .

---

Oh yes.... witness testimony is not evidence.
So then.... set Bill Cosby FREEE!!!!   We also seemed to have shown, that is not the case recently, or are you saying that the democrats had no reason to cite delay and to not confirm Kavenaugh?

As well, witness testimony is used in historical research, and in criminal trials all the time.   Atheists just seem to have double standards when it comes to things that don't fit their narrative.

So  much stupid ....

---

Well feelings are subjective.   Do you put much weight in feelings?  I see feelings as perhaps a need to look closer, or further investigate.   However, I don't expect others to have the same feelings that I do, or to accept them.   I think that you need a rational case to dismiss evidence.

1. you don't have any 

2. Nope this attempt to burden shift fails

---

Reasonable criticism and critique.  Sure! I think that Christianity has certainly been and should be investigated.   However; double standards and hyper-skepticism no.

Hyper-skepticism is theist speak for "you don't buy my BS " and you have yet to show any double standards you just want to give your foolish fairy tales credibility they don't have 

Also, I wouldn't recommend your approach described either.

LOL