RE: If theists understood "evidence"
October 10, 2018 at 10:48 pm
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2018 at 10:49 pm by RoadRunner79.)
(October 10, 2018 at 10:45 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(October 10, 2018 at 8:23 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: If you are really interested in discussing it, I would suggest you make a thread, where we can start over, and you can present the evidence for your claims.Already have. You asked a question..I answered it directly, my evidence is the authentic pauline epistles. Do you have some issue...?
Quote:This is such a gish gallop of an ever moving goal post. As soon as I reply to one thing; five more pop up, and my objections are being dodged. We can talk about the claims individually in a reasonable manner, and then see how they fit together.Do you understand evidence? Do you have a problem with what is evident in the authentic epistles?
Or we can go back to the OP; if that’s not being completely avoided.
So now you want to go back to talking about what theist (or I) don’t understand about evidence? I have been asking about that. It seems to have been ignored....
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther