RE: Not just catholics!
May 14, 2019 at 10:34 am
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2019 at 11:19 am by Drich.)
(May 13, 2019 at 11:34 am)WolfsChild Wrote:(May 13, 2019 at 11:09 am)Drich Wrote: piece of shit must like be the penultimate insult at the zoo.Its if one is younger than the other it is rape an ten year olds are not capble of making that division at 10 the 15 years old is almost an adult 3 yearsfrom being an adult they should know better
How about this hot rod.. how about rather than just being offended and start name calling everytime you get verbally smacked for falling a sleep at the intellectual wheel, how about trying to leave a topical Or if you are confused or don't know what I am talking about ASK A QUESTION post once in a while. how about not bailing on a topic just because the subject gets too deep for once. how about put yourself in danger of seeing a different perspective once in a while. I am far more forgiving and will answer any and all questions happily explain things if you just ask.. but if you want to have a word smack down I'm good with that too.
And what about the husband and wife team? is he guilty of rape?
Why do you guys only answer one or the other and never both?
ok... care to answer the other half of the scenario? two kids having consesentual sex is this not also rape? The law says it is, what says your pop moral standard?
THE OTHER 1/2 of the scenario douche, the other 1/2 meaning the older couple READ THE OP You've comment on the young couple like 3 times I get it you think young people having sex is rape got it no need to keep telling/why are you so obsessed with answering this part of the question only? Now move on to the second half of the question or can't you see past the young couple scenario?
(May 13, 2019 at 12:05 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Consenting to sex while not being in the mood and consenting to sex while wishing your partner were quicker to finish are both still consenting to sex, dipshit.
hey stupid f-er..
YOUR PEERS DON'T SEEM TO THINK SO!!!
So before you try and hang me for asking you a question maybe take the time to blast the people who "answered the question wrongly in your eyes!!!"
What a pos, for busting my balls for asking a simple question that your own peer group "Morality" has them divided on!
I KNOW IT IS NOT RAPE DUMMY!
The first scenario IS rape but most of you "morally good people" don't see it that way, and yes dumb ass the second scenario is NOT rape yet, most of you see it as so, even if they avoid the question like the plague! Look at how wolfie blasts "christians" for being so backward for having consensual sex even if it is simply unwanted. These are the morons you should be telling the second scenario was consensual! Not Me!
I know it was consensual as I wrote out the two senerios to test or rather show all of you how much of a corrupt system pop morality is! excusing rapists while condemning christians for having consensual sex!!!
So Again in case you missed it your people say, no it is not rape for kids to have sex (Meaning even if you call it Rape, none of you agreed to persecute the the girl and make her a sex predator or send her to prison for rape/prosecute her to the fullest extent of the law. No most of you are willing to call it rape and sweep it under the rug, by looking for reasons to excuse this coming from a supposed real life social worker!)
Now hypocrites who think this way (prosecute the christian having consensual sex and not prosecuting the rapist teen age girl) doesn't that put you on par with the RC church when it covers up crime? It seems you are all willing to forgive from a position of pop morality and want to sweep things under the rug, but when the church does the same thing it is evil? Hey dummies what makes the church evil when you are guilty of the same thing and you are "moral?"
So the OP is right... IT IS NOT JUST CATHOLICS WHO SWEEP RAPE UNDER THE RUG!
ATHEIST AS A MATTER OF "MORALITY" DO IT TOO!!!
(May 13, 2019 at 12:57 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Well, if my wife is not on the mood, i'll do something else. Its not like she owes me sex, and sex being more than one enjoiying eatchother. No fun for me if she isn't having.
it's so funny how you guys just cherry pick everything. in this specific scenario I also gave a second situation, but only one is answered to frame me in a negative light only.
Does you own personal integrity mean so little to you that it is ok in your eye to have me reprimand your dishonest approach to your posts each time you do it?? or do you honestly only see one point at a time? can't your mind process several related scenarios all at once?
(May 13, 2019 at 2:30 pm)madog Wrote: Heres a thought Drich, throw away your bronze age porn manual and ...
... a) Only put your dick where its wanted
... b) Remove it when its not wanted
... c) Don't fuck children
If in doubt find somewhere private and use your hand
As you can now see little thinker, i had a much bigger point. a point that you all have impaled yourselves on with your oh so 'good moral standard.' looks like the only real monsters here are they people who can call two kids having sex rape but care to do nothing about it just like the RC church... but want to persecute christians for having consensual sex. why??because in your twisted evil inspired version of morality so long as both parties agree. in your heart you think there is no restrictions. even if your mind can still identify a law broken. Yet at the same timeyou need for both parties to have fun is so paramount you are blinded to actual consensual sex just because it is not enjoyed by both people.
So A is wrong... Put your dick where you have consent douche bag even if it is not wanted.
B is wrong here is how to fix it: Remove it when consent is with drawn or you hit that priapism 3 hour threshold, then see a doctor!
C is incomplete, and completely mis represents the scenario.. because even if children are screwing other children someone needs to be held accountable.
It's funny how all of you ditched my original scenerio of children having sex to your own version of adults having sex with children to make things wrong.. why would your mind automatically go there when those cards never once hit the table by my deal? Yet everyone of you who wantto "rebuke me" has shifted my post to include children having sex with adults. how broken and or perverse is you mind that it allows you to go there when that discussion was never brought up?
