To be briefly pedantic, logic is a good thing to know about when evaluating arguments, particularly logical fallacies. For example the argument from ignorance is an informal logical fallacy where something is claimed to be true because it hasn't been proved to be false; or vice versa. That there is so much we don't know is not a reason to believe any particular thing that we don't know about is real. I can acknowledge that science is in it's infancy and there is more to discover than has been discovered; but it would still be fallacious for me to cite that as a reason why there must be invisible flying unicorns out there SOMEWHERE.
That you don't know something doesn't improve the odds of me being right about that thing at all.
That you don't know something doesn't improve the odds of me being right about that thing at all.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.