Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study

[Drich]

like what?

Donald Morgan's old compiled list is still there on infidels.org

https://infidels.org/library/modern/dona...tions.html

Most of them are due to self-defeating errors in logic as a result of contradictory statements, IOW internal error. The other type is sequence of events that display incongruity (B happening before A, when sequentially A happens before) resulting in chronological error. There are also inconsistencies, but those are from a lack of clarification or missing information.

noice.. if your going to be a lazy poc the so can i.. here is that same list answered : https://biblestrength.org/Infidels meaning this group show how donalds list are nothing but 1/2 truths and intentional misrepresentations based on poor translation. so now that that list is out of the way do you have something else?

---

 because i like it when people point out my sheer stupidity and lack of coherency so i can adapt and make personal change if needed.. at min i evaluate myself and thoughts at the very least... treating people the way YOU want to be treat means i treat you the way I want to be treated. this does not mean treat them/you the way they/you want to be treated.

the op made many stupid assumptions and assigned them to the evangelicals.. and at the end treated the evangelicals as a mindless twits for their beliefs in scripture (which btw are closer to the mark than the op's assessment) results in the op being treated by me how he spoke to the evangelicals.. like a foolish twit for not know the scripture he was preaching about.  If you guys do not want me to treat you with a heavy hand/be more respectful to you then SHOW RESPECT when you think you are in the right on a principle or teaching some well meaning brother may have trouble with.

Because i can promise you just because you all agree there is no god and were not able to use the bible successfully to find God, I promise you most of what you believe about this God the bible and His religion is wrong. Now the way i see it we can do this civilly/ask an honest question get an honest answer. or you can play pretend your a teacher/know better/in a position to tell christians what they should or should not believe, and i can hand you your ass o each and every subject.. your choice. why? not only am i treating you as you treat others, but because you are assuming the role of a teacher (for or against God) your judgement/God's scrutiny over your life will be twice as hard as a regular person. He will use your bs to judge you and i can promise none of you will stand up to it. so better you see your bs for what it is now and let it go. than try and stand before god with it.. because if i can use this to kick in your teeth/butt hurt you with my critical examination, WTF will you do at your judgement before God?

Still being groovy, in a respectful way.  Never stop being you.

I assume that I'll die in a fire or be tormented forever and ever or cease to exist™ - or whatever happens to be popular on am radio this month.  Easy question.

My turn, how often do you fantasize about kicking members teeth in?  On a scale of one to christ, how groovy is that?

Dude you know as well as anyone here i can be very respectful and i work hard to provide you with the information you all pretend to seek. it's the atheist pride and demand to be on top.. that i help cut back with a good dose of humility. 

your fate is between you and god. don't assume one way or the other as there is not a set bar rather you honestly working the best with what you had. this might not translate into riches/good job in heaven, but it doesn't automatically mean hell either.

2-3 times a month.. kicked in teeth is better than hell. "If your hand causes you to sin cut it off as it is better to enter into the kingdom with one hand than it is to enter hell whole." but seriously.. i say that to help you all to manage your pride.. most of you find it hard to do a victory lap when i take the bite out of your arguments.