(November 12, 2020 at 12:03 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(November 12, 2020 at 11:49 am)MilesAbbott81 Wrote: There is a huge difference in reading a small post of mine and a virtual encyclopedia of obviously erroneous information written by an ignoramus. I read it for a few minutes, which is much more than it deserved.
Unsupported assertions according to your...unsupported assertion?
Rude?
Excuse me, but your first post in response to me was a literal mockery, which you followed up with accusing me of dehumanizing people. I'll not be subjected to your moral double standard, thanks.
You realize the point of my arguing by assertion was to illustrate the valuelessness of that form of discourse, right? If you grasped that you might have felt educated instead of mocked. Although now that I think on it, it may sounded insulting because your original phrasing was presented in such an insulting and denigrating fashion.
And it's not my standard, it's the Bible's.
There was nothing in the post you mocked that was deliberately insulting or denigrating, as far as I know. Maybe I'm wrong. What I know, however, is that people on this forum are constantly insulting and denigrating Christians for having views that question popular scientific theories, and are relentlessly mocked, so I have no problem whatsoever in being "brutally" honest here.
You took offense because you disagree, and I tell you that your disagreement isn't actually with me, but with God.
Give me a break on the whole assertion thing. Every argument on here begins as an assertion. I've made assertions backed up with logic and/or Scriptures (necessary for religious discussions), you've simply mocked me.