(June 27, 2011 at 6:22 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(June 27, 2011 at 5:53 pm)Epimethean Wrote: But the difference is, whereas "occasional" real scientists push a bum piece of published work, ALL creationists push a bum piece of published work.
Did you even read my post? The fraudulent piece of work was rejected. So that refutes your claim right there. In fact, I am not aware of any fraudulent piece of work making it to the publishing stage in either the Journal of Creation or the Answers Journal. So they actually have better track records than some of the most prestigious secular journals.
Answers journal? Answers research journal?