Argument against "Divine Scripture"

[Tobie]

This begs a question. Most, if not all, religions believe in an infallible God, incapable of making mistakes.

A god incapable of making mistakes could not, by definition, be omnipotent.

Sorry, just occurred to me

A prime example of one of the arguments

And on the other hand, an omniscient god (i.e. one with perfect knowledge) would seem incapable of making a mistake.

No theist I have ever talked to about this issue sees a paradox here, naturally.

Omnipotence, Omniscience, Omnipresence and Omnibenelovence do tend
to contradict one another don't they?

If a god was omnipotent, it would be able to create a task it could fail it. If it was omniscient, benelovent and present, it would be willing and able to prevent evil. If it was none of these, why believe in it?

---

Celsus was a Neo-Platonist who died in the late 2d century. He has an excuse....unlike our modern xtian morons.

What is his excuse? Being a pagan? Or simply being alive nearly 2000 years earlier?

[houseofcantor]

Don't sweat it, ya gotta be insane to work that stuff. I'm all certified.

Come to find out, it's all mathematical concept. It originates from "divine fools;" a.k.a. the insane. Processing simultaneity. They called it "god" because they had no real concept of time and mathematics.