Last I checked, Ron Paul was all those things too and was an actual Republican (in third place as well).
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 10, 2025, 12:57 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Santorant: Birth Control is WHAT?
|
 (January 11, 2012 at 11:44 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Last I checked, Ron Paul was all those things too and was an actual Republican (in third place as well). The closer he gets to number 1 on the republican ticket, the greater Obama's chances of winning another term. It isnt anything personal R... thats just how America rolls. 
If only Rick Santorum's mother had used birth control...
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
 (January 11, 2012 at 11:44 pm)Minimalist Wrote:And that pretty much makes him the exception that proves the rule; he's invisible because he's somewhat reasonable.Quote:he's still reasonable.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png) I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad. 
Rick Santorum is the load his mamma should've swallowed.
42
 RE: Santorant: Birth Control is WHAT?
January 12, 2012 at 1:50 am
(This post was last modified: January 12, 2012 at 1:55 am by Justtristo.)
(January 11, 2012 at 8:52 pm)aleialoura Wrote: Maybe it doesn't matter what Rick Santorum thinks, because he's losing the primaries, and will probably never be the president, but this is still important. Mitt Romney, the front runner holds the same beliefs as Rick Santorum on this matter, and would support legislation to ban the human right to plan their futures, and their families. With this, of course, would be a ban on abortions, and there would literally be no way out of an accidental pregnancy. Not prevention, not protection, not termination- nothing. Women are nothing to these slimy fuckwads, but machines for making babies the way god and the bible intended. Firstly Roe vs Wade needs to be overturned before the federal government can be able to enforce such legislation. You are lucky to have an activist court system in the United States. We don't in Australia and only state (mine) has legal on demand abortion. Indeed in one state they actually tried a couple recently for having an abortion. http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2010/s3036539.htm Also I do not know if Mitt Romney really holds the exactly same views as Rick Santorum, let alone be willing to put such policies into implementation if he was president.
undefined
 RE: Santorant: Birth Control is WHAT?
January 12, 2012 at 7:28 am
(This post was last modified: January 12, 2012 at 7:32 am by Jaysyn.)
(January 12, 2012 at 1:50 am)Justtristo Wrote: Firstly Roe vs Wade needs to be overturned before the federal government can be able to enforce such legislation. You'd actually have to "overturn" the 4th Amendment since that is what the ruling was based on. The government has absolutely no need to know what goes on between you & a doctor. They couldn't prove it then & they can't prove it now. Also, & I reiterate, Rick Santorum needs to get hit by a bus.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
(January 12, 2012 at 7:28 am)Jaysyn Wrote:(January 12, 2012 at 1:50 am)Justtristo Wrote: Firstly Roe vs Wade needs to be overturned before the federal government can be able to enforce such legislation. Forgive my knowledge of American history and politics is woeful.
undefined
 (January 11, 2012 at 11:44 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:he's still (a) reasonable (Republican). But you repeat yourself.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (January 12, 2012 at 9:28 am)Justtristo Wrote: Forgive my knowledge of American history and politics is woeful. Oh don't feel bad, most Americans don't understand the actual ruling either.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
