Hamza Tzortzis

[Zakir_250]

Young girls just exposed him to what he is.

Better than exposing them to muhammad, you know, your paedo prophet

I know some Atheists who think Dawkins isn't a good scientist.

Some might do, but I don't like Dawkins when he speaks about atheist stuff. As a biologist he has the skills, something you do not

If you research history, you will find that Evolution was first brought up by Muslim Scientists.

---

He was, before he retired, the top biologist at one of the top 5 universities in the world, has a Phd in Zoology, has written peer reviewed papers, authored pop-science books, taught at UC Berkeley.

You think a young girl knows more about science than Dawkins does.

---

FWIW i'm going with stupid.

Did you watch my video that I just posted?

[5thHorseman]

'If you research history, you will find that Evolution was first brought up by Muslim Scientists.'

FAIL

'Evolutionary thought, the conception that species change over time, has roots in antiquity, in the ideas of the ancient Greeks, Romans, and Chinese as well as in medieval Islamic science'(Wiki)

Thanks you Greece.

[LastPoet]

If you research history, you will find that Evolution was first brought up by Muslim Scientists.

[Zakir_250]

Thank god I will be leaving this forum today.

[Napoléon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhVQcs4ZqwA

Video proves nothing. Muslims said salt water and and fresh water don't mix. Period.

They are wrong. Period.

[5thHorseman]

'Thank god I will be leaving this forum today.'

Thank fuck, not god.

[Darwinian]

Thank god I will be leaving this forum today.

It's not a trial. You don't have to serve notice. You could just leave now if you wanted to.

You certainly are an odd little character

[LastPoet]

I'll miss your batshittery

[Napoléon]

I'll miss your batshittery

I certainly won't.

[Cyberman]

Richard Dawkins is a peer-reviewed scientist and popular author with many best-selling publications to his name. Hamza Tzortzis and William Lane "Two Citations" Craig are mass debating preachers who appeal to the lowest common denominator. I know who I'd trust as a source of information.

But what about the video I posted where younger girls knew more about Science than him?

I'm sure that Prof Dawkins would be flattered if this really was the case. It would show that the religionist lobby is losing the fight to cripple the teaching of science in schools. However, this is a summary of your video:

* Clip of Richard Dawkins - a biologist - interviewing Muslim girls from his documentary (which I have seen but the title of which escapes me for the moment) in which Muslim girl recounts a Kerrang verse about saltwater and freshwater not mixing in the sea;

* Clip of Richard Dawkins remarking on his experience of filming the above interview;

* Unnecessary slide showing the verse in question;

* Clip from documentary presented by David Attenborough showing an apparent contradiction to Richard Dawkins;

* Some more slideshow stuff of little to no importance to the point already made.

All it shows is that Prof Dawkins' knowledge of hydrodynamics or whatever may be limited compared with his chosen field. I'm sure he would have 'lost' in a debate with another scientist in the relevant field. Those Muslim girls, like full-fledged apologists such as you and your friend Tzortzis, are denying the reality of the world outside the pages of their holy book. They didn't "know more about science than him", they quoted some poetry that has to be interpreted to make it fit anything real. The point of his own documentary, mined so shamelessly in your video, is that religious doctrine must not be allowed to overshadow the teaching of science and critical thinking - especially the latter.