Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 10:48 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Introduction!
#41
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 8:31 pm)Phil Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:21 pm)Phil Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:17 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:11 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Which peg are you going to hang your argument from, Sanity? So far you have invoked Newton's religious views and his intelligence, as though one was a function of the other (was he religious because he was smart or did his religiosity make him smart?). Now you seem to have dropped the religious shoe in favour of emphasising his intelligence, on which we all agree. I fail to see the point you're trying to make.

I apologise for the tangle of metaphors.

I'm trying to say intelligence and religion are not directly connected.

Sure they are. An inverse relation has been demonstrated but you are free to dispute the results if you want to.

Might look that up later. I'd definitely have to see a valid study or two.

You might? As I thought, you "might" choose to remain ignorant.

Let me clarify. I'm tired and may go to bed soon, so I don't feel like digging through studies. And when I get up I'll be away from the computer for two days moving furniture from an old home. If I remember on sunday to look it up, I will. Until then I lose.
This is stupid
Reply
#42
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 8:41 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:31 pm)Phil Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:21 pm)Phil Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:17 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote: I'm trying to say intelligence and religion are not directly connected.

Sure they are. An inverse relation has been demonstrated but you are free to dispute the results if you want to.

Might look that up later. I'd definitely have to see a valid study or two.

You might? As I thought, you "might" choose to remain ignorant.

Let me clarify. I'm tired and may go to bed soon, so I don't feel like digging through studies. And when I get up I'll be away from the computer for two days moving furniture from an old home. If I remember on sunday to look it up, I will. Until then I lose.
So you didn't mean you might look it up. You meant you will look it up? Either you don't know English very well or you lied or I am still misunderstanding you, which is it?
Reply
#43
RE: Introduction!
Or you're being a pedantic ass.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#44
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 8:52 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: Or you're being a pedantic ass.

Saying there is a difference between might and I will is being pedantic? I think, rather I know THAT is being an ass.
Reply
#45
RE: Introduction!
No, automatically assuming that a common turn of phrase, casually saying "I might have to go look that up," means he definitely won't, is being an ass.

[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#46
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 8:44 pm)Phil Wrote: So you didn't mean you might look it up. You meant you will look it up? Either you don't know English very well or you lied or I am still misunderstanding you, which is it?

What an idiotic thing to nitpick about.
This is stupid
Reply
#47
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 8:57 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:44 pm)Phil Wrote: So you didn't mean you might look it up. You meant you will look it up? Either you don't know English very well or you lied or I am still misunderstanding you, which is it?

What an idiotic thing to nitpick about.

It's idiotic to point out that might and will are two different things? Tell you what insanity, read my signature then apply it to yourself.
Reply
#48
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 9:00 pm)Phil Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:57 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote:
(April 5, 2012 at 8:44 pm)Phil Wrote: So you didn't mean you might look it up. You meant you will look it up? Either you don't know English very well or you lied or I am still misunderstanding you, which is it?

What an idiotic thing to nitpick about.

It's idiotic to point out that might and will are two different things? Tell you what insanity, read my signature then apply it to yourself.

No, it is definitely Pitnicking. Did my miner misteak offind you? Then I don't care. Deal with it.
This is stupid
Reply
#49
Introduction!
Howdy
Reply
#50
RE: Introduction!
(April 5, 2012 at 9:09 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote: No, it is definitely Pitnicking. Did my miner misteak offind you?

I'm deeply offhanded by that remake.

Welcome.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  introduction dr. underhill 10 79 Yesterday at 11:19 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  introduction europeanatheist 15 658 October 27, 2024 at 9:39 am
Last Post: europeanatheist
Big Grin An introduction to who I am Pocahontas 7 760 May 23, 2024 at 4:45 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Introduction Veni 5 936 July 3, 2022 at 7:43 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Introduction Data 9 1242 June 19, 2022 at 8:04 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  A (re)-introduction bennyboy 10 2274 June 11, 2022 at 8:35 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Introduction Disagreeable 15 1906 January 25, 2022 at 2:37 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  atheists - edit to add Introduction ergo 60 6056 November 28, 2021 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Here is My Introduction AtheistQuest 23 3270 August 25, 2021 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  The End8888 Introduction UniverseCaptain 29 2850 August 12, 2021 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)