Sex Outside Matrimony Unsafe.

[Jaysyn]

You obviously haven't been doing it right.

Ouch!!

Before I posted this we had the exact same # of posts. Isn't that weird?

[Tempus]

I felt pretty healthy after my non-marital forays in the bedroom. And lounge. And hallway. And bathroom. And laundry. And kitchen. And... well, anyway.

[Cinjin]

That's why priests have sex with little boys. No marriage and no STDs!

IT'S WIN WIN BABY!!

[Undeceived]

Sexual promiscuity is dangerous to your health (1 Corinthians 6:18; Romans 1:27). The Bible warns that “he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body,” and that those who commit homosexual sin would “receive in themselves” the penalty of their error. Much data now confirms that any sexual relationship outside of holy matrimony is unsafe.

Visit
Sex Habits Linked to Early Death, Disability (Fox News)

And of course, Fox News would be the ones..

So now scientific data confirms that any sexual relation outside of holy matrimony is unsafe and can cause STD's and cervical cancer, premature death's etc...

But if you are given god's precious gift and receive his sacrament of holy matrimony, you are 100% safe and you can have all the sex you want.

If both partners were virgins when they got married, there wouldn't be an STD problem, would there?

If you stay abstinent, you’re less likely to bring an STD to the marriage. If your partner does the same, they are less likely to bring an STD to the marriage. In order for marriage to be just as dangerous as outer-marriage, one first has to engage in the promiscuous behavior this study warns against. That makes the sex habits at fault, not marriage.

[Tobie]

And of course, Fox News would be the ones..

So now scientific data confirms that any sexual relation outside of holy matrimony is unsafe and can cause STD's and cervical cancer, premature death's etc...

But if you are given god's precious gift and receive his sacrament of holy matrimony, you are 100% safe and you can have all the sex you want.

If both partners were virgins when they got married, there wouldn't be an STD problem, would there?

There's not going to be an STD problem if people practice safe sex. You have no right to tell people how to act in the bedroom. If you think I'm going to stop having sex because some celibate bloke who lived 2,000 years ago said so, you'd better think again.

[Anomalocaris]

And of course, Fox News would be the ones..

So now scientific data confirms that any sexual relation outside of holy matrimony is unsafe and can cause STD's and cervical cancer, premature death's etc...

But if you are given god's precious gift and receive his sacrament of holy matrimony, you are 100% safe and you can have all the sex you want.

If both partners were virgins when they got married, there wouldn't be an STD problem, would there?

If you stay abstinent, you’re less likely to bring an STD to the marriage. If your partner does the same, they are less likely to bring an STD to the marriage. In order for marriage to be just as dangerous as outer-marriage, one first has to engage in the promiscuous behavior this study warns against. That makes the sex habits at fault, not marriage.

If you stayed in the trees, there wouldn't be any of the problems associated with civilization, would there?

[Cinjin]

There's not going to be an STD problem if people practice safe sex. You have no right to tell people how to act in the bedroom. If you think I'm going to stop having sex because some celibate bloke who lived 2,000 years ago said so, you'd better think again.

and lets face it ... if jesus did exist, it's highly unlikely that he was celibate.

And if he was a conman, preaching to multitudes of people - he would've been the rock star of that time period. He would've been hittin all kinds of tail! Hell, jesus would've been loaded up with STDs!

[Loading Please Wait]

If both partners were virgins when they got married, there wouldn't be an STD problem, would there?

Virgins can have STDs. People can be born with STDs or contract an STD just by getting it under your nails. You do not have to be sexually active.

Some parents accidently infect their children with diseases like herpes during diaper changes. Unwashed hands can spread diseases just like sexual activity.

If you stay abstinent, you’re less likely to bring an STD to the marriage. If your partner does the same, they are less likely to bring an STD to the marriage. In order for marriage to be just as dangerous as outer-marriage, one first has to engage in the promiscuous behavior this study warns against. That makes the sex habits at fault, not marriage.

Sex will happen. It's a biologic function that the bible condemns. Humans are sexual beings, there's no denying it. When a (hetero) man sees titties, or a hot ass, he will be sexually attracted to it, whether he is a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim, or an atheist. This doesn't mean he will act on it though.

Without sex, life would be pretty meaningless, in my opinion. Sex connects people. It brings them closer together. People need physical contact with each other.

People are going to have sex, no matter what. The thing is, there are things called condoms, and other ways to have "safe sex". Instead of preaching about abstinence, we should teach ways to have safe sex instead.

Seriously, get laid and use proper protection.

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

1 Cor 6:18: "Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body."

Romans 1:27: "In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."

These verses don't mention anything about health problems. In 1 Cor the "sin against his own body" was him not respecting the "temple" of the holy spirit which is his body. Apparently the Holy Spirit is stuck in believers body and doesn't particularly enjoy prostitutes for some reason. The Romans passage has been commonly interpreted nowadays to refer to disease. It's actually not though. The "due penalty" is homosexuality itself (not disease) and their "perversion" (a very biased translation of "error" or "sin") was not homosexuality, but worshiping other gods.

[Anomalocaris]

and lets face it ... if jesus did exist, it's highly unlikely that he was celibate.

And if he was a conman, preaching to multitudes of people - he would've been the rock star of that time period. He would've been hittin all kinds of tail! Hell, jesus would've been loaded up with STDs!

Actually, based on what decription of Jesus there is that could plausibly be true, it seem quitely likely to me that Jesus was gay, and even as such couldn't get any except possibly from from his posse of half witted "disciples". So that he might have been celibate out of the sad inability to get any, coupled his appearently dubious parentage, seem to offer a rather more convincing explanation of why he might escape his unsatisfactory predicament through extravagant fantasies of being the son of god.