Sex Outside Matrimony Unsafe.

[Tobie]

All this "I am the Son of God" nonsense was probably over compensating for something

[Chemelonique]

Some religions also believe its sinful to have sex in any other position other than missionary. For example, in Islam you can't give blow-jobs or have anal sex etc. Lol its ridiculous how religion wants to have so much authority over all areas of you life..even in this intimate part of you life..

[Minimalist]

For example, in Islam you can't give blow-jobs or have anal sex etc.

Xtians have the same line of shit....except they then ask Pappy jesus to forgive them and that wanker always tells them "it's okay."

[Creed of Heresy]

Some religions also believe its sinful to have sex in any other position other than missionary. For example, in Islam you can't give blow-jobs or have anal sex etc. Lol its ridiculous how religion wants to have so much authority over all areas of you life..even in this intimate part of you life..

EVEN in intimate parts of your life? More like ESPECIALLY in intimate parts of your life. Procreation is the most fundamental aspect of survival, and religions know this, and that's why they're so fucking picky about everything involving sex: Because if you control the fundamental root of human nature, the rest of it is so much easier.

[The Grand Nudger]

Or maybe, after vomiting forth such a litany of bullshit, they ran out of ideas, and their minds began to wander toward what was really important to them in the first place, all this tedious god bullshit aside -other mens dicks, and just how terrible vagina is in the first place.

[Archsage]

Or, and this is likely the more plausible option, one's sexuality is one of the most meaningful aspects of the existence of humanity. The mere fact that all of us who exist are so as product of sexuality should tell you that the topic at least somewhat of an important thing. It would only make sense to look into then as something merely frivolously secular.

And that's just the thing, anything that has lofty importance -- a meaning beyond frivolity -- is bound to exit secularism. Sexuality is one such topic. Of course, you can treat it frivolously, but then you'd have to prove (at least to your own conscience) that it isn't something of any important ideal, or else supersede your conscience into making some false idealism out of your frivolous use of the action.

In the end, do and believe as you will. But ultimately, only what is True is what matters.

[The Grand Nudger]

I sure as hell hope there's more to my existence than where I stick it......lol. If my sex life even approaches top20 in "loftiness", I'm going to go ahead and check out before I do more damage than I've already done.

(what about things that are just "t"rue, lower case t...do they matter as well?)

[Creed of Heresy]

And that's just the thing, anything that has lofty importance -- a meaning beyond frivolity -- is bound to exit secularism. Sexuality is one such topic. Of course, you can treat it frivolously, but then you'd have to prove (at least to your own conscience) that it isn't something of any important ideal, or else supersede your conscience into making some false idealism out of your frivolous use of the action.

In the end, do and believe as you will. But ultimately, only what is True is what matters.

You do not capitalize a word if it is an adjective or a verb. Only a noun. And truth is not a person, place, or thing. But I know what's coming up, so, inb4 "god's truth." I love how you talk about "how you'd have to prove [x]" and then start hinting at something that cannot be proven or disproven. Contradictions, hypocrisy, yadda yadda I'm tired of this dance, how many more thousands of times do we have to deal with this?

[Archsage]

You do not capitalize a word if it is an adjective or a verb. Only a noun. And truth is not a person, place, or thing. But I know what's coming up, so, inb4 "god's truth." I love how you talk about "how you'd have to prove [x]" and then start hinting at something that cannot be proven or disproven. Contradictions, hypocrisy, yadda yadda I'm tired of this dance, how many more thousands of times do we have to deal with this?

As you can plainly see for yourself, I capitalize whatever word I fancy deserves the emphasis of personification. If that is disagreeable with you, then you'll just have to settle with being discontent?

Nonetheless, I wonder what you have to say about the content of my post exactly? I've noticed your comment about "having to prove". But you seemed to have misunderstood me on that, which is why you've fallen head-first in the trap of philosophical epistemic questioning. What was being referred to by "having to prove", was the fact that one would have to reconcile within themselves the validity of their own actions. Which is why I included that parenthetical adjunct to the phrase, something that you for some reason omitted.

The point being, for those of you not clear on what I'm saying, is that unless you convince yourself that one's sexuality is not important, then sexuality for you will be important. Anything that is important to the point that exceeds frivolity can no longer be said to be secular, any more than human rights is a 'secular' ideal.

[Violet]

Or, and this is likely the more plausible option, one's sexuality is one of the most meaningful aspects of the existence of humanity. The mere fact that all of us who exist are so as product of sexuality should tell you that the topic at least somewhat of an important thing. It would only make sense to look into then as something merely frivolously secular.

Sex is merely frivolously secular?



Come to think, I do cry out to the deities above during sex, and it as sex is my preferred coping mechanism it is very important in my life (indeed, it is no frivolous matter to me... I fucking need me some sex or I go completely stir crazy). Nothing 'mere' about it either, as I try to have a lot of it.

I'll give you secular, since I'm an apathetic to the existence of gods, until the day they fuck with me. Then it's on (motherfuckahs!).

And that's just the thing, anything that has lofty importance -- a meaning beyond frivolity -- is bound to exit secularism. Sexuality is one such topic. Of course, you can treat it frivolously, but then you'd have to prove (at least to your own conscience) that it isn't something of any important ideal, or else supersede your conscience into making some false idealism out of your frivolous use of the action.

It's not necessarily difficult to prove something to yourself... rather, I find that for most of us: it's more likely we don't even think about it when we do it. Trust, for instance... without which, we might not have a society where we share so much as a beer with each other.

See... 'importance' (@ your high regard for the word 'frivolous') is subjective. Some things, such as reading, are likely very important for a neurological surgeon, whereas it's not remotely probable to cross the mind of a three year old human child as consequential.

One man's treasure, the next man's junk, amiright?

In the end, do and believe as you will. But ultimately, only what is True is what matters.

Roger troll, I will always do and believe as I will. Truth is unknowable, therefore not knowing squat is of highest import to ya Good luck with that.