Posts: 4055
Threads: 39
Joined: October 2, 2011
Reputation:
16
RE: US States Marriage Map
May 30, 2012 at 6:35 pm
Quote:So the two things do not receive a similar, or even comparable amount of stigma?
I don't think the comparison is a biological one do you? Rather a social one.
Well, they don't. It's "comparable", if we lump the cousin-cousin marriage under the context of incest. But in general, it isn't, unless the marrying cousins themselves are not gay.
Quote:I'm not you people. So please refrain from calling me that.
Well, I'm generally the only opposing party in such threads. So everyone that isn't on my side, is on the other side.
Quote:Quite.
Have it your way then. As I said, things are orderly around my parts of the globe, thankfully.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?
Posts: 12231
Threads: 324
Joined: April 14, 2011
Reputation:
140
RE: US States Marriage Map
May 30, 2012 at 7:23 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2012 at 7:34 pm by Napoléon.)
(May 30, 2012 at 6:35 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, they don't. It's "comparable", if we lump the cousin-cousin marriage under the context of incest. But in general, it isn't, unless the marrying cousins themselves are not gay.
Well, they do. Certainly where I'm from marrying your cousin is often looked at as far worse a 'moral crime' than being a homosexual. Ofcourse only to the kinds of people who think it is a moral crime at all.
Quote:Well, I'm generally the only opposing party in such threads. So everyone that isn't on my side, is on the other side.
Ofcourse. Because everything is perfectly black and white. Everybody either has one opinion or the other.
Quote:Have it your way then. As I said, things are orderly around my parts of the globe, thankfully.
This is supposed to mean what exactly? Yet again Mehmet you bring up these veiled comments hinting at your nations apparent 'superiority'. I've tried calling you out on it. I've tried being polite to you about it. But every damn time I seem to converse with you it turns into some kind of pedestal where you can claim this superiority, or make petty jabs as though you live in such a perfectly moral society and everywhere else is inferior.
Posts: 3179
Threads: 197
Joined: February 18, 2012
Reputation:
72
RE: US States Marriage Map
May 31, 2012 at 10:42 am
...Really? REALLY, California? No gay marriage allowed there? I'M LOOKING AT YOOOOUUUUU, SAN FRANCISCO!
Posts: 6191
Threads: 124
Joined: November 13, 2009
Reputation:
70
RE: US States Marriage Map
May 31, 2012 at 12:37 pm
(May 31, 2012 at 10:42 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: ...Really? REALLY, California? No gay marriage allowed there? I'M LOOKING AT YOOOOUUUUU, SAN FRANCISCO!
Blame the fucking Mormons. They fucking contributed a SuperPAC's worth to proposition H8.
Though, to be fair, the Anti-Prop 8 campaign was criminally mismanaged. Saying "We're here, deal with it" wins you no friends -- this was a far cry from their previous approach to model themselves after the civil rights movement, which was more "We're just like you. We're wearing nice clothes, are respectable and are just like you."
Dumbshits, all around.
But yeah.
Fuck all Mormons in good standing -- they deserve every bit of hate for it was their money that fed the Prop 8 campaign.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Posts: 12400
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: US States Marriage Map
May 31, 2012 at 12:51 pm
(May 30, 2012 at 5:07 pm)Chuck Wrote: What you might also not know is the cultural taboo against first cousin marriages is probably a very recent thing. 80% of all marriages throughout the history of Homo Sapeins have been between second cousins or closer:
Kinship-Marriage-Anthropological-Perspective-Anthropology
Also, the overall risk of birth defect in first cousin marriages is comparable to the risk of birth defects from women married to non-relatives, but giving birth at age 40. So if a woman is giving birth past age 40, she is doing a worse thing for her offsprings than marrying her first cousin.
So if marriage between first cousin is to be outlawed based on risks to the offspring, then women should go to jail for attempting to conceive after 40.
Finally, Charles Darwin of the Origins of Species married his first cousin Emma Wedgwood. Some of their offsprings turned out rather well even by the standards of their father. The real danger comes when you go overboard. I recently discovered this guy.
Ladies and Gentlemen, meet Charles II, King of Spain from 1665-1700.
And here is his family tree, with many of the relationships noted for clarity.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 1965
Threads: 83
Joined: June 15, 2010
Reputation:
37
RE: US States Marriage Map
June 1, 2012 at 10:20 am
Sanctity of Christian Marriage, FTW!
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Posts: 305
Threads: 21
Joined: May 17, 2012
Reputation:
7
RE: US States Marriage Map
June 1, 2012 at 2:05 pm
(May 30, 2012 at 4:10 pm)Shell B Wrote: Point is: Move to New England. We're assholes, but we're not that kind of asshole.
Alternatively, move to old England, where your bottom is your own business. Also, we're arseholes, but only if you live on a council estate
|