Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 30, 2012 at 7:42 pm
(May 30, 2012 at 7:32 pm)Napoleon Wrote: (May 30, 2012 at 6:50 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Words are meaningless, friend. Maybe it's time someone acts. You talk and talk, but where is your act?
If you believe me to be a danger to the honestly very on-topic discussions of this forum, do something about it.
Is this baiting? I'm curious.
In my opinion, no. It is a call to action. You'll notice that earlier in this thread, he suggested that RD take up a rule change with the staff.
This forum has had enough vendettas. Please just report posts that you think are against the rules. Obviously, taking up issues with a specific member publicly have historically been the biggest blow outs in this forum.
Posts: 2080
Threads: 52
Joined: April 11, 2010
Reputation:
47
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 7:56 pm
I totally missed this entire discussion. I just wanted to pop in and say that I also grew tired of kilic entering every (exaggeration) thread and turning it into a discussion about his rampant bigotry. So... I put him on ignore.
Problem solved and I didn't even need to make the staff have a big discussion about it. Simplicity.
Posts: 739
Threads: 30
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 8:42 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2012 at 8:42 pm by Gambit.)
I mentioned on another thread that I dislike him, purely based on the fact that his name is Mehmet. Anyway, this thread started off boring and then continued to suck the life out of me for over 5 pages. That dude who says that Mehmet blatantly promotes (his) nationalism is right, though. He's a Mehmet; they're like that. Go to the thread I'm talking about, before judging me.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 8:45 pm
Ha, I'll judge you right now, fucker. 
Your observations can be one hundred percent correct and it still means fuck all. He's allowed to be as racist and politically-incorrect as he wants. We are not the opinion police.
Posts: 739
Threads: 30
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 9:10 pm
(May 30, 2012 at 11:41 am)Stimbo Wrote: Here's a clue just for you Mehmet:
Homosexuals do not want to change marriage for everyone. The idea is to extend the legal recognition of marriage to include same-sex marriages in addition to the traditional ones. Much in the same way, in fact, that happened when mixed-race marriages were recognised in the legal context. It will make no difference to anyone else, married or not.
Let's just suppose that you were to fall asleep for a month and during that time same-sex marriage was in fact legalised. I guarantee you won't notice any difference after you wake up.
(May 30, 2012 at 8:45 pm)Shell B Wrote: Ha, I'll judge you right now, fucker.
Your observations can be one hundred percent correct and it still means fuck all. He's allowed to be as racist and politically-incorrect as he wants. We are not the opinion police.
I don't really give much of a rats ass for your opinions, woman. Now, go make me a sandwich, and it best be gud; you hea'?
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 9:16 pm
I'm going to make you a shit sandwich and serve it up with a side of deal with it, pussy.
Posts: 739
Threads: 30
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 9:24 pm
Mehmet knows the politics of my country. From this day forward, all but one Mehmets will fall at the blade of my sword. So it was written in the year 2012, that Most; but not all, Mehmets were spared. Our God Gringo is so merciful in his wisdom; and likes people who knows his country's history. No, no, he is all merciful, that is better. No one can argue with that. Forget infinite regression. If I am all merciful then no one has any reason to doubt me. There; someone carve that on a piece of stone. They have computers now, you say? OK, encode it into Linux, so as only those who are super-geeky can receive my word.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 9:28 pm
Oh, drunk Gringo, how I like you so much more than boring Gringo.
Posts: 739
Threads: 30
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 9:35 pm
I'm not drunk, I'm just big bladdered. I'm going to bed though, so your entertainment is over. Carry on with you dramarama thread.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 30, 2012 at 9:42 pm
There is no such thing as drama when you're in bed, Gringo.
|
