Posts: 2844
Threads: 169
Joined: August 24, 2012
Reputation:
46
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 26, 2012 at 12:41 am
(August 26, 2012 at 12:35 am)Jeffonthenet Wrote: Perhaps it is not God that failed, but you.
Also highly flawed.
First we have to deal with the fact that it's the responsibility of the one who initiates the communication to make sure their message is conveyed clearly and is well understood. Even if you can get past that, there's the fact that if there's something wrong with me, if I'm imperfect, then that's a failing on God's part, too. A perfect being cannot, by definition of the word 'perfect,' create an imperfect creation.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Posts: 196
Threads: 7
Joined: July 3, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 26, 2012 at 12:48 am
(August 26, 2012 at 12:41 am)TaraJo Wrote: (August 26, 2012 at 12:35 am)Jeffonthenet Wrote: Perhaps it is not God that failed, but you.
Also highly flawed.
First we have to deal with the fact that it's the responsibility of the one who initiates the communication to make sure their message is conveyed clearly and is well understood. Even if you can get past that, there's the fact that if there's something wrong with me, if I'm imperfect, then that's a failing on God's part, too. A perfect being cannot, by definition of the word 'perfect,' create an imperfect creation.
I edited my post to give more info, such as the contention that God is under no obligation to reveal himself to you.
"the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" (1 Cor. 1:19)
Posts: 66297
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 26, 2012 at 7:38 am
Then I am under no obligation to worship this god. End of Jeff.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 196
Threads: 7
Joined: July 3, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 26, 2012 at 11:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2012 at 11:34 pm by Jeffonthenet.)
(August 26, 2012 at 7:38 am)Rhythm Wrote: Then I am under no obligation to worship this god. End of Jeff.
If I grant you this, it is still true that you could be under obligation to moral commands which makes it such that God is under no obligation to save you if you do not live a moral life… regardless of if you worship Him or not.and it seems plausible that no one has lived such a moral life when we consider the great suffering in the world and how relatively little we all do to end it. Such a state seems consistent with traditional Christian teaching which states that we are only saved by the mercy of God and not by anything we have done.
"the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" (1 Cor. 1:19)
Posts: 28248
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 26, 2012 at 11:44 pm
If I am not able to rise above my destiny of my own volition, then in what sense am I responsible for not rising above my destiny?
Posts: 196
Threads: 7
Joined: July 3, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 26, 2012 at 11:53 pm
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2012 at 11:57 pm by Jeffonthenet.)
(August 26, 2012 at 11:44 pm)apophenia Wrote:
If I am not able to rise above my destiny of my own volition, then in what sense am I responsible for not rising above my destiny?
I think the use of the word destiny assumes that God is responsible for your fate. Even if every man except for Christ sins, it doesn't follow that it is not their responsibility just as it is no excuse for moral evil to say "everyone does it."
"the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" (1 Cor. 1:19)
Posts: 28248
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 27, 2012 at 12:29 am
Now, now, don't be changing the subject with an irrelevant exegesis. The topic was God's grace. If God's grace is necessary, than how am I responsible for it being required? If it's not necessary, your doctrine is wrong. Either I'm responsible for meeting a bar I can't meet, or your God is a Karmic leech. It's a simple dichotomy. Feel free to carve out a third option if you can. But quibbling about the metaphysics implied by the word "destiny" does not cut the mustard.
Posts: 196
Threads: 7
Joined: July 3, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 27, 2012 at 12:42 am
(August 27, 2012 at 12:29 am)apophenia Wrote:
Now, now, don't be changing the subject with an irrelevant exegesis. The topic was God's grace. If God's grace is necessary, than how am I responsible for it being required? If it's not necessary, your doctrine is wrong. Either I'm responsible for meeting a bar I can't meet, or your God is a Karmic leech. It's a simple dichotomy. Feel free to carve out a third option if you can. But quibbling about the metaphysics implied by the word "destiny" does not cut the mustard.
I am not claiming that you are responsible for meeting a bar you cannot meet. Indeed, I agree that this would be wrong. I am not sure what you mean about God's grace being necessary. Philosophically speaking, I would think that God's grace (His undeserved favor) being for any given person is contingent (as opposed to necessary) upon two things… the sin of person X and the free choice of God.
"the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" (1 Cor. 1:19)
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 27, 2012 at 12:53 am
That doesn't really make you any variation Buddhist, that just means you're an admirer of philosophy.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 2658
Threads: 121
Joined: March 19, 2012
Reputation:
27
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
August 27, 2012 at 2:22 am
I know next to nothing about Buddhism, but one thing I'm fairly sure of is that it's an atheist religion i.e. not associated with gods. Therefore to say you're an atheist Buddhist doesn't make much sense. I think you were meant to say you're a secular Buddhist which means you see it as a good philosophy but don't believe in the supernatural aspects.
I hope none of this changes your stance on it. It's awesome to hear that it has impacted you positively, and I'd say why not just find out more? If you see it as a philosophy then you can't go wrong in my opinion.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
