Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 3:54 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
#41
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist


[Image: dalai%20lama%20wisdom.jpg]


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#42
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
-Wonders if he can get that printed on some toilet paper-
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#43
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
Apophenia, that is surprisingly good in my eyes.
Reply
#44
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
Absolutely, in a cheap, Hallmark sort of way.
(I'm more than a little pissed that the Dalai Lama keeps getting reincarnated as a coddled peddler of inexpensive wisdom and woo btw. I can never really decide whether or not I think he's a hapless rube, a tool; or a clever con is his own right.)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#45
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
(August 28, 2012 at 1:42 am)genkaus Wrote:
(August 28, 2012 at 12:58 am)Jeffonthenet Wrote: I'm referring to general moral rules agreed upon by atheists and theists alike. It seems to me that both of us have transgressed seriously against these in negligence to the suffering of the third world. In truth, even if we do give a lot of our money to the third world starving, we hold on to petty material things which could save the lives of people by buying them food or vaccinations.

Why on earth would you think you have a moral obligation to help the third world countries?

I meant the starving people in them, not the country itself.

Quote:Why exactly would you imagine that holding on to the material possessions and enjoying them is immoral?

Holding on to them when they could save a life if you gave more of them away is immoral.

Quote:In fact, before you talk about the "general moral rules agreed upon by atheists and theists" - you better lay them down so that I can tell you why exactly they are bullshit. (And just me, by the way. I wouldn't be stupid enough to speak for other atheists).

Im thinking basic morality like it is wrong to hurt people because one enjoys it. If someone doesn't agree this moral rule I submit that there is something mentally wrong with them.

(August 28, 2012 at 9:04 am)Rhythm Wrote:
(August 28, 2012 at 12:58 am)Jeffonthenet Wrote: I'm referring to general moral rules agreed upon by atheists and theists alike. It seems to me that both of us have transgressed seriously against these in negligence to the suffering of the third world.
Speak for yourself.

You are totally misunderstanding my point. I do actually give quite a bit.

Quote:
Quote:In truth, even if we do give a lot of our money to the third world starving, we hold on to petty material things which could save the lives of people by buying them food or vaccinations.
If sending food and vaccinations would eradicate the problems faced in third world countries there would be no third world countries by now.

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR51nHFTdNSkqlQwlm2ABA...gYYzQU8tFg]
http://www.builderswithoutborders.org/
[/quote]

There are lots of refugees in camps, for example, whose lives could be saved by better medical care care which could be provided if we donated more money.
"the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" (1 Cor. 1:19)
Reply
#46
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
I have never associated Buddhism with anything other than atheism. Many followers have stated that is what attracted them to it in the first place.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#47
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
I don't remember a ton from my World Religions class, but I recall that there are different types of Buddhism, for example Theravada Buddhism, and their views can vary widely. I think there is a great range present from Atheistic to Theistic. When I was into Zen Buddhism I recall the Zen Master Shunryu Suzuki saying that you can be of any religion and practice Zen Buddhism.
"the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" (1 Cor. 1:19)
Reply
#48
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
(September 1, 2012 at 9:47 pm)Jeffonthenet Wrote: I meant the starving people in them, not the country itself.

So did I.

(September 1, 2012 at 9:47 pm)Jeffonthenet Wrote: Holding on to them when they could save a life if you gave more of them away is immoral.

And your justification for this bare assertion is....?

(September 1, 2012 at 9:47 pm)Jeffonthenet Wrote: Im thinking basic morality like it is wrong to hurt people because one enjoys it. If someone doesn't agree this moral rule I submit that there is something mentally wrong with them.

That says nothing about letting someone suffer out of indifference, i.e. neither hurting them nor alleviating their hurt, being immoral.

(September 1, 2012 at 9:47 pm)Jeffonthenet Wrote: You are totally misunderstanding my point. I do actually give quite a bit.

You are the one missing the point. The question is not if you give a bit, it is why should we give a shit.

(September 1, 2012 at 9:47 pm)Jeffonthenet Wrote: There are lots of refugees in camps, for example, whose lives could be saved by better medical care care which could be provided if we donated more money.

And we should do that because...?
Reply
#49
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
(August 29, 2012 at 7:11 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Absolutely, in a cheap, Hallmark sort of way.
(I'm more than a little pissed that the Dalai Lama keeps getting reincarnated as a coddled peddler of inexpensive wisdom and woo btw. I can never really decide whether or not I think he's a hapless rube, a tool; or a clever con is his own right.)

Might be cheap and easy and simple, but it's all works better than the garbage you'd find in most holy books.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto

"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Reply
#50
RE: Philosophical Buddhist who is still an atheist
(August 24, 2012 at 5:14 pm)TaraJo Wrote: I wanted to see if there can be reasonable reconciliation on these beliefs for me.

I've been an atheist for almost a decade and a half now. Back then, I made a deal with any deity out there: if you exist and you want me to believe, it's well within your power to reach out to me so you can do that. Until then, I'm going to not believe and assume that if any God does exist, it doesn't want me to believe. As you can guess, no supernatural being has revealed themselves to me.

However, about four years ago, I had some big changes go through my life and as much as the changes were for the better in the long run, they were also very stressful at the time. Emotionally, I hit a low point; I made multiple suicide attempts, cried almost constantly and made a bad habit out of cutting myself on a fairly regular basis.

After about a year of that, things changed. One of the first things to change for me was that my personal life stabilized more and, yes, this played a big role in changing my mindset. It's hard to be emotionally stable if you aren't socially stable. However, there was more to it. I also looked up more information on gaining calmness and peace of mind and things like that. As a result of that research, I learned a lot about Eastern philosophies, especially Buddhist philosophy. The meditation, the mindfulness, the connection to the rest of the universe and the laid back perspective all resonated with me and thinking that way seemed to be a positive influence on my life.

That's not saying I believe in Buddhism as a religion. As much as the philosophy has helped, I have still had no sign from a supernatural being that has convinced me of anything. I have no reason to believe reincarnation exists or that karma is anything more than an abstract idea. In fact, most of the benefits of Buddhism for me can be interpreted as benefits via psychology. However, I know that a lot of people DO consider Buddhism a religion and they take it very seriously.

I guess what I wanted to ask is, is it reasonable to be both an atheist as far as the supernatural goes but believe in a Buddhist philosophy?

I used to have a strong bias against Buddhism for some time.
But I had changed my mind for a little after I started pondering on "Emptiness is form and form is emptiness.". I tried to make sense of it, and at the end, when I could capture it's meaning in words and could actually write them down, it really came to me that there is a philosophical truth behind some of it's teachings.

(August 29, 2012 at 7:11 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Absolutely, in a cheap, Hallmark sort of way.
(I'm more than a little pissed that the Dalai Lama keeps getting reincarnated as a coddled peddler of inexpensive wisdom and woo btw. I can never really decide whether or not I think he's a hapless rube, a tool; or a clever con is his own right.)

The Dalai Lama is actually a title which did not start with the first Dalai Lama it was awarded to. The first Dalai Lama to which the title was given to was actually given as the title of 3rd Dalai Lama, whose name was Sonam Gyatsho leader of the Gelug order of Lamaism(or Tibetan buddhism), two others were awarded this title posthumorously.
It actually had deep political reasons behind it, being related to a certain Altan Khan, who wanted others to believe that he was a reincarnation of Kublai Khan(And Sonam Gyatsho proclaimed him as such), and used the Lamaist ideology to make his reign legitimate where it was illegitimate, due to his missing blood relations to Chingiss Khan.
[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Video thread for interesting philosophical discussions on YouTube and elsewhere GrandizerII 2 293 August 26, 2020 at 8:43 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Philosophical zombies robvalue 131 15259 March 7, 2018 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: polymath257
  A Philosophical Conundrum BrianSoddingBoru4 11 1730 October 27, 2017 at 9:23 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Philosophical zombie. robybar 3 1572 June 8, 2017 at 8:21 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Philosophical ideas and acting "as though" bennyboy 12 2084 March 31, 2017 at 11:15 am
Last Post: henryp
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 12078 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Arguments for God from a purely philosophical perspective Aegon 13 2861 January 24, 2016 at 2:44 am
Last Post: robvalue
  A Great Philosophical Question. Pyrrho 26 6439 September 28, 2015 at 11:31 am
Last Post: Pyrrho
  One philosophical argument for existence of supernatural. Mystic 59 15716 July 20, 2015 at 10:01 pm
Last Post: Cato
  Philosophical Underpinnings for Rejecting God learncritic 28 8892 June 1, 2015 at 10:26 pm
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)