RE: Things about Obama that annnoy me
September 10, 2012 at 4:53 am
(This post was last modified: September 10, 2012 at 5:43 am by 5thHorseman.)
(September 9, 2012 at 3:39 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: (September 9, 2012 at 1:29 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: Brit hater, pfft. What a load of bollocks.
Then respond to the article, one point at a time, please.
I wish you good luck in your pointless goal in defending the overbearing cretin.
I'll try
. I don't like him either, but these attacks are idiotic and incredibly weak.
Quote:1. Siding with Argentina over the Falkland Islands
Quote: DS wrongly claims Obama wants to return control of the Falkland Islands from Britain to Argentina: the US refused in April to endorse a final declaration on Argentina’s claim to the islands at the Summit of the Americas, provoking criticism from other Latin American nations;
http://www.leftfootforward.org/
Quote:2. Calling France America’s strongest ally
Right, he's on a platform at the white house with Nicolas Sarkozy, the most Atlanticist French President ever(he even liked us), and people expect Obama to say 'You're a great ally, but behind; Britain, Israel, Phillipines, South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, etc. etc. Of course he's going to say that. Which politician doesn't try suck up to his opposite number? Sarkozy wasn't there for a tea party, Obama wanted something, and Sarkozy is as vain a politician as anyone could hope to meet.
America's best friends should be; Canada, China and Mexico, as they are there 3 biggest import and export partners. Or does war only qualify for 'best friend' status? And I wonder if Canada is crying into it's pillow at night from being spurned by it's economic best pal?
Quote:3. Lecturing Britain on a federal Europe and undercutting British sovereignty
“I believe [political integration is] in Europe’s interest and I believe that is in the United States’ interest because we want a strong Europe.”
I want to stress that the UK needs to remain in the EU. The US does not want to see Britain’s role in the EU diminished in any way. The message I want to convey today is that we want to see a stronger EU, but also a stronger British participation within the EU. This is crucial if, together, we are going to meet all the global challenges facing us, including climate change and security.
So Britain has MORE influence, maybe? Britain still is one of the 3 powers of Europe, and without EU membership, we'd have sod all power. All of our main political parties agree with this, even the tories.
Quote:4. Betraying Britain to appease Moscow over the New START Treaty
Information about every Trident missile the US supplies to Britain will be given to Russia as part of an arms control deal signed by President Barack Obama next week. Defence analysts claim the agreement risks undermining Britain’s policy of refusing to confirm the exact size of its nuclear arsenal.
So they'll know the size of our arsenal...... ok. At least the Russians will know what we have, yet not know what they have. I think that them having a number is worth getting something out of them. After all, they'll never be used and Russia is past it, and are not a threat anymore.
But it is a stab in the back nonetheless, I agree.
Quote:5. Airbrushing Britain from Europe
A striking feature of Obama administration speeches on Europe is the frequent omission altogether of Great Britain, as if it doesn’t even exist. A major recent example of this was an address in January 2012 by Philip H. Gordon, US Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs, on “the state of transatlantic relations”, which completely left the British out of the discussion of the role of US allies in the Afghanistan and Libya operations, as well as the Iranian nuclear crisis.
Obama isn't Philip H. Gordon. Nor is he his babysitter. Nor does he dictate his speeches for him.
Quote:6. Throwing Churchill out of the Oval Office
Firstly, wtf is a drink sodden long dead PM doing in the white house? What is the facination with people like Churchill and Diana? You have Jefferson, Franklin, Washington, Hamilton Lincoln, FDR and Teddy ffs. It's an endless list of wonderful AMERICAN people.
But for the bust, this is simply a lie;
Quote:DS says Obama removed a bust of British prime minister Winston Churchill from the Oval Office because Churchill represented British colonialism: White House curator William Allman said the bust, which had been on loan, was already scheduled to be returned before Obama took office; another bust of Churchill is on display in the president’s private residence, the White House says.
Quote:7. Placing a “boot on the throat” of BP
I think it was a bit ott, especially refering to BP as British Petroleum, a long since redundant name, but uou can hardly blame him given what happened and how awful BP's safety record is. Did anyone expect him to be nice about them after the spill fucked masses of sea and fucked a hell of a lot of American fish industries and tourism? Fuck no, and why should he hold back for the sake of our pension funds, laughable suggestion. What would angry Americans who have lost out far more than our pensioners because of the oil spill think if there president said 'hayho'? Not much.
Quote:8. DVDs for the Prime Minister
Seriously, who fucking cares. It's more than doubtful that Obama nor any preceeding President has anything to do with pointless presents. They run the most important nation and i'd put my house on this being a White House aides cockup.
Quote:9. Insulting words from the State Department
The mocking views of a senior State Department official following Gordon Brown's embarrassing reception at the White House in March 2010 says it all:
There’s nothing special about Britain. You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn’t expect special treatment.
Once again, he's no babysitter, nor a speechwriter, nor did he say this himself. Or is this maybe taken out of context, was it sarcasm by the official?
Quote:10. Confusing England with Great Britain
So...... a speech mistake, right.
That is one of the worst articles i've ever seen in a normally excellent paper. That journo is a bad journo. Nothing in that article shows insults by Obama to the UK bar the missile info. It shows mistakes, lies and half-truths from a half arsed journo who supports Bush and neo-cons.
A bit on the journo.
Quote:Nile Gardiner is a British conservative commentator, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at The Heritage Foundation, and a former aide to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. He is also a commentator on U.S. and British television and a frequent contributor to the Fox News network, and the London Daily Telegraph.
Quote:Gardiner is a supporter of the Transatlantic alliance and the idea that the U.S. and U.K. should "project power and influence across the world.”
Gardiner supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and has defended the George W. Bush administration's record in warfare, and in combatting terrorism.
It doesn't seem unreasonable that he is completely bias against Obama because he's a conservative neo-con that works for Fox and the Heritage foundation. Hardly objective like his historical education demands. Face it, to get on Fox you have to be a certain type of person anyway.
From another Telegraph journo;
Quote:His relations with Gordon Brown were frosty and his early dealings with David Cameron were overshadowed by the anti-British backlash to the BP oil spill.
But three years later, Barack Obama seems finally to have been fully converted. As he and his wife Michelle prepare to play host to David and Samantha Cameron on what has been designated "an official visit with a state dinner" - only the Queen can make a state visit - diplomats are noting the warmest language he has ever used about Britain.
In a briefing to White House correspondents last week an Obama spokesman twice referred to the "special relationship", highlighted the "strong personal bond" between the two leaders and described Britain as "our closest partner in the world" - the most enthusiastic assessment of US-UK ties since Mr Obama took office.