Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:13 pm
Well if little Bill says so.. LOL
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Who?
Are you talking about that shit little cringeworthy children's cartoon now? Sometimes I like Bill Cosby...but he can at least be annoying when it's bullshit like that based on him, lol.
EvF
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:16 pm
So I'm just saying - it's not a matter of policy. So what do you mean by 'choice'?
EvF
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Well. I dunno what ur on about at all. But for the record - I googled holosync and it looks like a load of total and utter bullshit, yes.
EvF
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:26 pm
The site loads a li'l fella in the sidebar (movie clip) who introduces himself as little Bill.
"So I'm just saying - it's not a matter of policy. So what do you mean by 'choice'?"
Choice = non-free will, as we've discussed. Policy? WTF is that??
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:28 pm
You can't just 'decide' consciously what you believe whenever you feel like it. Beliefs are deeper than that. And so is losing a belief. That's what I'm saying.
Beliefs compel you, you don't just pick whatever you wish to believe in when you feel like it. Unless you're talking of 'belief in belief', where you don't actually believe but you believe the belief is 'a good thing', etc - that sort of thing.
EvF
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: Hello Truth Seekers
August 15, 2009 at 4:39 pm
How do you know it's deeper than that? Obviously in my experience it isn't. There maybe complex reasoning there may not. No use calling it more than it is. Like anything, it's a rational process. A conclusion is just that.