now that wasnt so hard was it?
I will read through them and then post my explainations and\or appology.
I will read through them and then post my explainations and\or appology.
Child abuse ?
|
now that wasnt so hard was it?
I will read through them and then post my explainations and\or appology. RE: Child abuse ?
November 21, 2012 at 7:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2012 at 7:59 pm by Shell B.)
Yes, it was. It was a waste of my fucking time. On a side note, don't apologize. I just want to know where you stand, which you explained two pages ago. The only reason we are still harping on the contradictions is because two of you can't be arsed to read it yourself. Sorry, but I find it annoying, particularly coming from napo, who I am rather sure does it just because I get on his nerves. Anyway, good night. I'm seriously done with this thread.
I guess the main problem is that I make a destinction between certain factors of influence when talking about the raising of a child, and didn`t phrase these destinctions out in a ways which would make a reader understand that I make destinction. For which I take responsebility.
I destinct between school education - what a child learns at school (public school, private school, eventualy homeschooling) - which in my opinion shouldnt be influenced by any ideology, and the standerd of what is education and not should be set by professionals who have knowlege on this field. And between the "raising\upbringing" of a child, which is deterimned by the social surroundings of where the child lives - parents and their religious aswell as political beliefs, cultural traditions, language, poverty or oposite, and furthermore other circumstances. - In which one can only intercept if laws are broken (sexual childabuse, parental negligence and other) And both shouldnt be capable to interfere with each other. (November 21, 2012 at 7:17 pm)Shell B Wrote: There is no reason for you to come in here and resort to your old bullshit tactics, Napo. I said I was joking around with you earlier in this thread, so remove the tampon, bro. "old bullshit tactics" And what exactly do you mean by this? All I've been doing is stating I disagree that Germans has been ambiguous about his stance in all of this. What am I not allowed to do that? RE: Child abuse ?
November 21, 2012 at 9:13 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2012 at 9:20 pm by Something completely different.)
This should stop.
It has mutated from a debate, into a Mad Max 3 style cage fight. (November 21, 2012 at 11:05 pm)Waratah Wrote:(November 21, 2012 at 9:13 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: This should stop."Two men enter one man leaves" Its just shell B's normal meet and greeting style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09-GbpOd9T4 RE: Child abuse ?
November 22, 2012 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2012 at 12:49 am by SpecUVdust.)
^^^ Now that's child abuse. So much psychological scarring. Sick. But the parents believe it... It's within their rights, as much as I hate to say that. Barf.
RE: Child abuse ?
November 22, 2012 at 12:26 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2012 at 12:31 pm by Napoléon.)
(November 21, 2012 at 9:13 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: This should stop. It has? Here I thought I was simply asking questions. Still, I'd like to hear what shell thinks my old bullshit tactics are. When someone has a tendency to slyly make such accusations without even specifiying what it is they are accusing me of, I don't think it's unfair to ask what it is they are accusing me of. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|