Child abuse ?

[Napoléon]

Bloody hell Germans, I'm with you up until a point but these massive replies are just not necessary.

Aside from the fact you're just going over what's been said for the last 6 pages or so, they're needlessly convoluted, and responding to someone who's said they're done at least twice now.

[Something completely different]

Bloody hell Germans, I'm with you up until a point but these massive replies are just not necessary.

It`s simply the way I am. I hate simplicity and simple explainations which haven`t been thought through - I prefer details and want for myself and others a as perfect as possible understanding of the matter.

The positive side, you will never find me posting about something I dont know anything about, or claims which I cannot back up.

Aside from the fact you're just going over what's been said for the last 6 pages or so, they're needlessly convoluted, and responding to someone who's said they're done at least twice now.

I agree, but from my view it was worth posting my points again and again.

[Kousbroek]

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive...n/07061805

“Such abuse begins with the involuntary involvement of children in religious practices from the time they are born,” says Narisetti. “All religions, through ritual, preaching, and religious texts, seek to bring children into day-to-day religious practice.”
“This gives holy books and scriptures, as well as those who teach them, an early grip on the developing minds of young people, leaving an indelible impression on them.”

"The UN must then take a clear stand on the issue of the forced involvement of children in religious practices; it must speak up for the rights of children and not the automatic right of parents and societies to pass on religious beliefs"