People not laughing at an unfunny "witticism" does not mean they are butt hurt.
![[Image: 10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg]](https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/t1.0-9/10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg)
Hall of wit and epicness.
|
People not laughing at an unfunny "witticism" does not mean they are butt hurt.
![]()
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Hall of wit and epicness.
February 25, 2014 at 2:58 am
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2014 at 2:58 am by fr0d0.)
More epicness from discipulus (February 24, 2014 at 9:07 pm)discipulus Wrote: I am sorry, but science is neither omnipotent nor omniscient. And if you disagree atheists, that's fine. I disagree with everything you put in this thread. But I'm also a member here, and from my point of view this is truly epic, so please bear that in mind. This thread isn't an appropriate place for bleating. Thanks (February 25, 2014 at 2:58 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Since when was stating the obvious considered epic? ![]()
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! (February 25, 2014 at 2:58 am)fr0d0 Wrote: This thread isn't an appropriate place for bleating. It is when your standards are so low.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
![]() (February 23, 2014 at 7:15 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(February 22, 2014 at 3:19 pm)discipulus Wrote: If empiricists hold to a proposition which states that we should only take a proposition to be true if it can be scientifically proven, then their view is self-refuting, no? Drivel speak is not awesome. I'd literally rather shoot myself in the foot than play word gymnastics with that guy
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite. Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment. Quote:Some people deserve hell. I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong. ![]() (February 25, 2014 at 1:30 pm)Luckie Wrote: Drivel speak is not awesome. I'd literally rather shoot myself in the foot than play word gymnastics with that guy I got sucked in. Only thing epic about discipulus is his smugness.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- (February 25, 2014 at 1:44 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:(February 25, 2014 at 1:30 pm)Luckie Wrote: Drivel speak is not awesome. I'd literally rather shoot myself in the foot than play word gymnastics with that guy Here's my post that catalogs the breeds of different apologists. This guy is like the first identified breed, "the Pompous Apologist", but is more passive aggressive in his approach. Where Ryft will be snippy and snooty in his dealings with skeptics, this guy more prefers the "oh but I love you" approach.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Are you guys still licking?! Wow
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|