Posts: 4349
Threads: 385
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
57
RE: Kittenshere Continue thread
August 22, 2009 at 12:10 pm
This is a very wierd sort of logic. As far as I can make out you are arguing that because there are things that defy human understanding it therefore follows that there must be a higher power.
But how can you come to this conclusion if the understanding and the ability to deduce a higher power is beyond our understanding?
Posts: 14940
Threads: 686
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
142
RE: Kittenshere Continue thread
August 22, 2009 at 12:16 pm
The problem is how you decide to define something as "unexplainable". We can label things as "unexplained" easily (if they lack a explanation), but to label something as "unexplainable" means that there literally is no explanation. In order to know this, one must know everything (or they cannot know that an explanation might be produced in the future).
There are many things we still cannot explain, but every year some of those move into the set of "explained" things, and we are able to do this through scientific endeavor (and logic!).You cannot give me one valid reason why there would be a higher force. This certainly doesn't mean "there is no higher force", but that there is no good reason to believe there is one. Saying "there exists a higher force but it is far too complex for our logic to understand" is a cop-out, the ultimate non-answer. If such a being defies human logic, then to logically form an argument for it is contradictory.
I agree, everything has a cause within the universe we live in. We seek out these causes, and seek to explain these causes. However just because there exists the question "what caused this" does not mean the answer is "God". The presence of a question only implies the lack of an answer, and you can deduce nothing from a lack of an answer (far less an actual answer).
Posts: 844
Threads: 26
Joined: May 24, 2009
Reputation:
10
RE: Kittenshere Continue thread
August 22, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Of course Earth did not create itself, but we do know that a big fairy in the sky did not go "POOF" there it is either. We at least have a Scientific explanation for it's creation from the "Evidence" that we have studied/observed.
Intelligence is the only true moral guide...
Posts: 4349
Threads: 385
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
57
RE: Kittenshere Continue thread
August 22, 2009 at 4:12 pm
The idea that everything has a cause became very popular after Newtonian physics came along. The universe seemed to work like clockwork where everything was orderly and followed cause and effect.
Then Einstein and quantum physics came along and we learned that the very fundamental smallest building blocks have very strange rules and the universe is not so orderly. And cause and effect do not necessarily follow.
In quantum physics there are many cases where the effect comes before the cause. For example, it may seem that a vacuum is devoid of all matter but close study shows that particles are winking into existence and out again for no apparent reason. What happens here is that two particles with opposite mass simply appear from nowhere, hang around for a while to what's going on and then promptly annihilate each other. They actually 'borrow' energy from their future in order to exist in their past. A sort of effect then cause. (Unless there's a black hole nearby but will go into Hawking's radiation another day)
So basically this idea you have that everything must have a cause, whilst seeming logical, is not actually correct.