Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 28, 2024, 9:40 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
new testament, matthew chapter 2
#81
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
[quote='justin' pid='396389' dateline='1360034962']
[quote]no i didn`t disagree with joseph. i would`ve keep away from those nut cases also. but he didn`t stay in eygpt he was on his way to jerusaluem( not sure if i spelled that right?) then god came to him again and said change of plans herods son took over and he`s bad too so go to nazerath.[/quote]Let's look at what is actually written:
Mt2:
19 Now when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, 20 saying, “Arise, take the young Child and His mother, and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the young Child’s life are dead.” 21 Then he arose, took the young Child and His mother, and came into the land of Israel.

22 But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea instead of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. And being warned by God in a dream, he turned aside into the region of Galilee. 23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, “He shall be called a Nazarene.”

[quote] i mean i undertook the impression that god was a secret informant that wasn`t gonna do anything but just give joseph some tips here and there.[/quote] What gave you that impression? verse 23 points to the full fillment of prophesy rather than, the tip giving business. God's 'tips' always push in the direction of His will.

[quote] my standards for a god like i said were higher and from the perception people have from the bible that i have dealt with. so with that said i was trying to get some a rational outside perspective to see if there was a better defense for this,as my opinion, bad cia movie. [/quote]...based on your standards of God. Or rather your personal idea of God. One that seems to be based in personal feeling.

[quote]lol and what`s up with all those innocent children that herod ordered to death? like i said i found myself asking "wtf?" alot.[/quote]Herod knew he was at the end of his life and wanted his legacy to continue on (look up Herod the greats accomplishments) He was setting up a 1000 year dynasty, and did not want some outside king to tear down what he spent a life time building.


[quote]first: ok so are you saying that satan is just as powerful or more powerful than god?[/quote]After creation God put man incharge of this world. At the fall of man Man gave control over to satan. At the time of Christ's physical birth (till his death) satan ruled this realm and had heavy influence over the hearts and mind of man. (Some sects of Christianity still believe he has this power over man.)

[quote]before anything else is`nt jesus god? [/quote]The Name "Jesus" refers to the Physical incarnation of God the son, and The Physical aspect of of Jesus had a begining and an end.

Even so yes. Jesus was God the Son.

[quote]oh ok so herod didn`t send the wise men? he was mad cause they were going to worship someone else? then why if god was fond of sendin g them messages did he not tell them where jesus was so they didn`t get confused and start this whole mess.[/quote]It's only a mess if your looking to control the hearts and minds of men.

[quote] i mean children died because of this decision to ignore the results that he knew would come from the mistake so what`s up with that?[/quote]'Death' is not the end for God. It is only the beginning of another phase of life. as such is not a crime/sin.

third; 4;31 deuteronomy
31 (for the Lord your God is a merciful God), He will not forsake you nor destroy you, nor forget the covenant of your fathers which He swore to them.
This is a long way from the doctrine that says God is All Merciful, or is always bound to show mercy. For the same Bible speaks of the Wrath of God. If you read this passage contextually it simply says God is A merciful God. Meaning a God who shows Mercy. (But is not limited to this quality)

[quote] for mercy and matthew 5;44 tells to model after him to love your enemy.[/quote]44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,

This is not even close to the doctrine of omni benevolence you were leaning on.


[quote]fourth: an earthly realm? like the physical realm? what did he do that wasn`t of this realm when he was here? this doesn`t seem to make any sense.[/quote]
John 18:35 "Am I a Jew?" Pilate replied. "It was your people and your chief priests who handed you over to me. What is it you have done?" 36Jesus answered, "My kingdom does not belong to this world. If my kingdom belonged to this world, my servants would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But for now my kingdom is not from here."

Christ makes several other references of this before his death when people want to elevate him to an earthly king.
Reply
#82
Re: RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
(February 4, 2013 at 9:10 pm)catfish Wrote: dance puppet, dance!


(I'm still a Christian here)
.

People see you acting like a child here. Of that, at least, we can be certain.

(February 4, 2013 at 10:01 pm)catfish Wrote: First you must determine if the "Christian" you are speaking to believes that the Bible is "infallible" or "inerrant".

This Christian (me), can conscientiously reject anything that isn't good. What's worse for "them", is that I can back up that position with scripture...
.
With catfish, you have to understand that you aren't dealing with a Christian in any known sense of the word. Apart from his own sense, which is laughingly backed up by scripture, according to him. On his own. Allowing for fatal mistakes, because there are bits missing that would make him right. But he's just guessing at that. Oh and he was born with belief. He did not rationalise it. It was not a decision. At the age of 3 he realised this, and began prophesying. He's a bit of a one kid phenomenon actually.
Reply
#83
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
(February 4, 2013 at 8:09 pm)catfish Wrote: fr0d0, would you like to have a public debate in which I prove that you have lied and deflected? I'm going to leave "troll" out of it as that's mostly opinion based. However, if I prove that you lied and deflected, being a troll would naturaly be assumed by all witnesses.

Are you ready to face the truth of who and what you are?
.
I can't stop laughing at this Smile

a Debate with catfish:

catfish: you don't have proof
me: here's the proof
catfish: you don't have scriptural truth (and I'm not going to tell you what I do and do not accept of scripture, suffice to say I brew my own)
me: ?.?
catfish: I predicted that you would say that. (I just didn't write it down because y'all don't want to know)
me: ^_^
catfish: keep on dancin'
me: I dancin Smile
catfish: (I'm still a Christian here)
me: Angel
catfish: yeah so you have no proof
me: Rolleyes
catfish: I win
me: Popcorn
Reply
#84
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
Coward, are you afraid of a 3 year old's reasoning? Or is simply being an unrepentant, lying troll what you desire to portray yourself as still???

If you think you could prove I'm not a Christian, why don't you? Why do you back out and post definitions that try to make me adhere to backwards, pagan, asswiping, asshole cults? Cults that practiced Sunday worship, taught Greek myths, outright lies, doctrines of men, all of which were never taught, nor supported by Yeshua? Remember, he offered reconciliation while alive....

Would it be because you know that scripture supports what I say? Probably, and it burns you to no end to ever admit I could be right, huh?
I'm proud of who I am, I am PROUD that I saw through that pagan bullshit the moment I laid eyes on it. I am proud that I recognised this as a CHILD... Too bad for most of you who bought the lie, I see it in your eyes, the betrayal you felt, the hatred you feel now. "They" feel the same hatred towards others too, it's a fucking hate cult what people call "Christianity" nowadays, just look above... ^^^

Matthew 19:13-15 King James Version (KJV) (love this unsolicited scripture thingy... lol)
13 Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them.
14 But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
15 And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence.

I am willing to play the "no cherrypicking" game with you, have always been. All you have to do is produce 1 verse that can support the notion that the Bible is the "infallible" or "inerrant" word of God. Shouldn't be hard to do right?
.
Reply
#85
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
(February 4, 2013 at 7:12 pm)catfish Wrote:
(February 4, 2013 at 1:08 pm)pocaracas Wrote: So I'm the one who decides what in the bible you consider to be Yeshua and what's not?
Doesn't make much sense...

It's clear there are some parts where you accept J.C.'s quotes as Yeshua's.... and some parts where you don't.. hence your sig and cherrypickers.

I was just trying to make it clear what parts are those. I'm a biblical ignorant, I don't want to make you pay attention to some detail you're already not cherrypicking. I just want to know which ones you are cherrypicking....

No, you decide for yourself, you're just being silly... Undecided
For what it's worth, Jesus is derived from the Greek word and the Greek word is derived from the Hebrew word. All the same person.

As for myself, I reject any and all things that I can identify as pagan in origin. Virgin birth, human sacrifice, triune god, etc.
.

I think I see.... except for the part where I decide what it is you believe... but I agree that that part is silly.

Thanks for the clarification and, once again, sorry for the derailing... I see others have taken upon themselves to carry on questioning this christianity of yours... sorry about that. Sad
Reply
#86
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
No worries...

They can question it all they want, I'll still be here and I'll still be a Christian.
.
Reply
#87
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
(February 5, 2013 at 11:20 am)catfish Wrote: I am willing to play the "no cherrypicking" game with you, have always been. All you have to do is produce 1 verse that can support the notion that the Bible is the "infallible" or "inerrant" word of God. Shouldn't be hard to do right?
.
Mark 14 (Jesus speaking)
49 I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and you did not seize Me. But the Scriptures must be fulfilled.”

There ya go!
Reply
#88
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
And? Which "scriptures"? Only the OT? (remember, that's all he had at the time)
Explain how that supports "infallible" or "inerrant"...
.
Reply
#89
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
(February 5, 2013 at 1:44 pm)catfish Wrote: And? Which "scriptures"? Only the OT? (remember, that's all he had at the time)
Explain how that supports "infallible" or "inerrant"...
.
It obviously supports infallible or inerrant because, if fallible, there would be no reason for Jesus to say "the Scriptures must be fulfilled."
Reply
#90
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
That makes no sense to me.
Yeshua also said Moses' laws weren't from God, so those scriptures cannot be "fulfilled" nor considered "infallible".
.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Did Jesus call the Old Testament God the Devil, a Murderer and the Father of Lies? dude1 51 9100 November 6, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The Gospel of Peter versus the Gospel of Matthew. Jehanne 47 6353 July 14, 2018 at 12:22 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  Old Testament Prophecy Proof of Jesus Nihilist Virus 45 6802 August 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  The Immorality of God - Slavery in the Old Testament athrock 307 38259 January 31, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament Randy Carson 69 17162 October 8, 2015 at 10:51 pm
Last Post: orangedude
  The Historical Reliability of the New Testament Randy Carson 706 114274 June 9, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  The Utter Irrelevance of the New Testament Whateverist 66 11236 May 24, 2015 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Question of the Greek New Testament Rhondazvous 130 23111 May 19, 2015 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aractus
  The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1 Theoretical Skeptic 25 7243 May 6, 2015 at 7:01 am
Last Post: Hatshepsut
  New Testament arguments urlawyer 185 23584 March 24, 2015 at 5:26 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)