|
If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
|
"Researchers are eagerly awaiting a DNA study of male siblings with at least one gay brother by Bailey and other scientists at Northwestern University due in early 2009, because it may shed light on the role genetics plays in sexual attraction. "
Try some newer research... Internet dumbasses... 
 (March 8, 2013 at 7:59 pm)catfish Wrote: Let's take it a step futher to a level where I believe most would agree with? Ever heard of Philip the second? He was king of Macedon and the father of the far more famous Alexander the great. after he had fought and defeated the greek city states he comanded those to march on Sparta and to take it either by force or by other means ar arround 345 BC. Philip the second, sent a messenger to the city with the following message: Quote:"You are advised to submit without further delay, for if I bring my army into your land, I will destroy your farms, slay your people, and raze your city." the Spartens sent back a messenger with the following message: Quote:if thus the famous "laconic phrase" or "laconic reply" was born. And in this thread as with every outlandish thread teearlgreyhot opend aswell as your reply I quote, all of these contain if as the central structure of the question or argument and therefor deserve no other reply but: if . 
Research done in 2009 isn't new enough? Do you have newer research that refutes it? Seriously, one-liners aren't going to cut it, boy. Cough up some information of your own.
(March 8, 2013 at 9:47 pm)Shell B Wrote: Research done in 2009 isn't new enough? Do you have newer research that refutes it? Seriously, one-liners aren't going to cut it, boy. Cough up some information of your own. Maybe if you read the thread you'd find your newer research. But you're too busy trying to rustle my jimmies to notice... . |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
And . . . I'm out.
