Posts: 2844
Threads: 169
Joined: August 24, 2012
Reputation:
46
Complications within the marijuana debate
March 24, 2013 at 1:04 pm
So, this is something that came up in my government class and I thought I'd ask what people think of it here.
Marijuana is going to become legal, it's just a question of when. The public has been getting increasingly supportive of decriminalizing it, but then that brings in another problem.
Right now, marijuana is generally less damaging to your health than tobacco. It's nothing about marijuana being inherently healthier or safer or anything, but because of all the additives put in the cigarettes.
So, when marijuana becomes legal, what's the obvious thing to happen? Big companies are going to distribute it and they're going to do so the same way they do tobacco. All those additives and chemicals and other junk that gets added to tobacco..... those are going right into the marijuana.
So, what do you think should be done about this? Should they just be allowed to add all kinds of toxins to marijuana? Why or why not? If not, what should be done to prevent it?
I live on facebook. Come see me there.
http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: Complications within the marijuana debate
March 24, 2013 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2013 at 2:09 pm by CapnAwesome.)
As far as I'm aware, it's false that marijuana is less damaging to your health than tobacco because of additives. I'm fairly sure that's a myth. It's just that you can't smoke nearly as much of it. If you could smoke 2 packs of weed a day, I'd highly suspect similar damage to your lungs.
Regardless it doesn't matter for legalization. People should be allowed to put whatever they want into their own bodies.
Posts: 30098
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
158
RE: Complications within the marijuana debate
March 24, 2013 at 7:57 pm
My recollection is that weed is far more damaging, per amount. Given that taste isn't the main selling point of weed, I'm not sure it's a big concern.
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation:
84
RE: Complications within the marijuana debate
March 24, 2013 at 9:25 pm
My only contribution is that not too many people grow their own tobacco, but many people grow their own weed. I know this is largely because weed is illegal, but I don't really see it changing unless people become very lazy. Even then, most of us who smoke have so much access to the good stuff, I can't imagine people will settle for chemical-laden crap.
Posts: 6896
Threads: 89
Joined: January 13, 2013
Reputation:
116
RE: Complications within the marijuana debate
March 24, 2013 at 10:17 pm
So, a doctor told me that smoking weed every day is like smoking 1 cigar a day. So yeah, if you smOke it, it's not good. Smoking anything isn't good for your lungs, it paralyzes the cilia or something. So the chances of getting COPD are just as equal if not more, than tobacco. Weed in edible version is offered at the dispensaries, and is how alot of very sick people injest the thc. Myself included at one point.. Or there's a vaporizer, which is harmless to your lungs where it delivers you the thc via water vapor. So that's harmless.
Tobacco on the other hand, WILL give you cancer and COPD. It makes you radio active, and it has shit like arsenic in it. They're damn near TRYING to kill you if you're stupid enough to buy them (myself included at some point as well).
I agree that homegrown will be the future for awhile. I think that eventually someones going to take over the market like history shows us happens, and some laws will be passed and the profits from this venture will be used to enforce those laws preventing home grown crops and then will eventually push out small businesses completely, leaving us at the mercy of big corporations. Then the weed farmers will yet again have to go underground.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's
sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god
does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.