Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 24, 2013 at 5:28 pm
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2013 at 5:28 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
It's not incredibly novel, basically just treating the game as though it were SPICE, Verilog, or VHDL.
(that you could then plug into a cartoon chicken farming operation..lol)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 202
Threads: 8
Joined: April 19, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 24, 2013 at 6:09 pm
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2013 at 6:10 pm by Love.)
(April 24, 2013 at 5:28 pm)Rhythm Wrote: It's not incredibly novel, basically just treating the game as though it were SPICE, Verilog, or VHDL.
(that you could then plug into a cartoon chicken farming operation..lol)
Are you a professional electronic engineer or is it something you like to do in spare time? Did you study it academically? I am not really familiar with hardware description languages. It is not something I have ever studied academically or undertaken professionally/in spare time. Looks very interesting, though.
Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 24, 2013 at 6:12 pm
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2013 at 6:16 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
No, No, I flirted with becoming one after getting a sweetheart job due to security clearance (and working under the table as a kid in a shop just down the street that manufactured some of the pcb's). Ultimately, it's just a hobby. I dig holes in the ground and fill them back up for a living - sometimes. Mostly though, I just drink and hang out with my wife and kids -and play games with a couple of whores from these boards..sometimes.
(amusingly, electronics manufacturing is deceptively simple...the majority of the people who do it are pulled from the t-shirt and photo-development industries. Design is pretty simple too. Pile up enough nands and you can do anything.)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 118
Threads: 10
Joined: April 13, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 25, 2013 at 6:11 pm
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2013 at 6:13 pm by Alter2Ego.)
(April 7, 2013 at 7:01 am)Aractus Wrote: (April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ORGANIC/BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION THEORY is chained to abiogenesis theory (the belief that life resulted from non-life spontaneously). Evolution and abiogenesis are two different theories, but because pro-evolutionists are notoriously atheists and dismiss an intelligent Designer/God from the equation, abiogenesis is what they are stuck with. When asked how life came from non-life by itself, they have no credible answer. So to avoid the problem of the long debunked theory of abiogenesis, some have jumped onto the creation bandwagon and claim they are theists who believe in evolution theory. In fact some claim they are Christians. You are incorrect in principle and in practicality. Practicality would presume that probability plays a role in creating organic life from non-organic life, this is as absurd as presuming that probability plays a role in the formation of crystals. Probability plays no role, it's just physics, entropy, and the ultimate inevitability of the physical processes. In principle we know how abiogenesis works but we don't know why. In other words, we don't know what set of circumstances activates it nor how to reproduce them at present. ALTER2EGO -to- ARACTUS:
You showed up at Post 7 telling me that my I am incorrect about abiogenesis. Then you follow that by making the contradictory statement: "In principle we know how abiogenesis works but we don't know why." Which principle are you referring to, considering that abiogenesis theory was debunked more than 150 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others? Below is a quotation from a source along that line.
Quote:In 1859, Louis Pasteur entered a contest sponsored by The French Academy of Sciences to examine the now hotly contested spontaneous generation [abiogenesis] controversy, the same year as the publication of The Origin of Species. In the contest, Pasteur decisively undermined the concept of spontaneous generation [abiogenesis]."
http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/01/...#more-2371
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 25, 2013 at 6:17 pm
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2013 at 6:20 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(April 25, 2013 at 6:11 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: Pasteur decisively undermined the concept of spontaneous generation[/color][/B] [abiogenesis]."
His decisive undermining was decisively wrong. Now go take and pass 4 years of formal biochemistry in a real universiity before opening your mouth again.
Posts: 7153
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 25, 2013 at 7:32 pm
Scientific research into the origins of life on Earth did not end with Pasteur.
Molecule of life emerges from laboratory slime
Quote:CREATING life in the primordial soup may have been easier than we thought. Two essential elements of RNA have finally been made from scratch, under conditions similar to those that likely prevailed during the dawn of life.
More info on the above.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 682
Threads: 37
Joined: January 7, 2013
Reputation:
5
Speaking of the god of the gaps
April 25, 2013 at 7:40 pm
Quote:In 1859, Louis Pasteur entered a contest sponsored by The French Academy of Sciences to examine the now hotly contested spontaneous generation [abiogenesis] controversy, the same year as the publication of The Origin of Species. In the contest, Pasteur decisively undermined the concept of spontaneous generation [abiogenesis]."
http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/01/...#more-2371
[/quote]
This test had nothing to do with scientifically discovered gap non-life to life a few billion years ago. This was an actual test of life being created millions of times every day as in feces creates maggots.
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Speaking of the god of the gaps
April 25, 2013 at 7:42 pm
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2013 at 7:42 pm by pocaracas.)
(April 25, 2013 at 7:40 pm)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote: Alter2Ego Wrote:Quote:In 1859, Louis Pasteur entered a contest sponsored by The French Academy of Sciences to examine the now hotly contested spontaneous generation [abiogenesis] controversy, the same year as the publication of The Origin of Species. In the contest, Pasteur decisively undermined the concept of spontaneous generation [abiogenesis]."
http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/01/...#more-2371
This test had nothing to do with scientifically discovered gap non-life to life a few billion years ago. This was an actual test of life being created millions of times every day as in feces creates maggots. No matter how many times you explain that... they'll never understand... 
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 25, 2013 at 8:01 pm
(April 25, 2013 at 6:11 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: Which principle are you referring to, considering that abiogenesis theory was debunked more than 150 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others?
Chuck laid waste to your Pasteur argument.
I'm curious as to why you think it important and significant to pluck out outdated scientific knowledge from 1859 in support the Genesis account that has existed in writing for over 3000 years?
Posts: 118
Threads: 10
Joined: April 13, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
May 19, 2013 at 11:23 pm
(April 24, 2013 at 8:44 am)paulpablo Wrote: (April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
ORGANIC/BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION THEORY is chained to abiogenesis theory (the belief that life resulted from non-life spontaneously). Evolution and abiogenesis are two different theories, but because pro-evolutionists are notoriously atheists and dismiss an intelligent Designer/God from the equation, abiogenesis is what they are stuck with. When asked how life came from non-life by itself, they have no credible answer. So to avoid the problem of the long debunked theory of abiogenesis, some have jumped onto the creation bandwagon and claim they are theists who believe in evolution theory. In fact some claim they are Christians.
When you say the atheists and the pro evolutionists, I assume you're talking about the majority of biologists and scientists out there? ALTER2EGO -go- PAUL PABLO:
As the record of history shows, the majority of scientists once agreed with the Catholic Church that earth is the center of the universe, when in reality, the earth orbits the sun. So exactly what is your point regarding majority rule?
|
