AF Hall of Shame (Theist edition)

[Esquilax]

I think that's more fr0d0 than this topic in particular. He tends to answer things that way regardless of the issue.

After seeing his latest reply, I'd have to agree.

Fr0d0: saying "it's dumb," is not an answer, or an argument, nor an elucidation or explanation. It's fuckery.

[fr0d0]

Then go look at what I actually said Esq

[Cyberman]

Stupid in the most basic usage of the term stupid. That's how. Nothing complex. Smack your head on the desk stupid.

No, I understand what stupid means, I meant what is it about the post that makes it stupid? I apologise if this has already been addressed, it's not really convenient for me to go through the last couple of pages right now looking for it.

[Cinjin]

[fr0d0]

Oops wrong thread.

Good cannot commit murder, as murder is unjust killing. Rape... can that ever be justified? I didn't think so.

---

@ Stimbo : Ryan sets up an impossible straw man in every argument. It's too funny. Then he shoots it down like anyone should be surprised. To me it's hilarious. He keeps doing it. I guess he really doesn't have the first incling of what any theist is saying in all of the time he's been here. It's kind of remarkable that anyone could be that stupid.

[Mystical]

Yeah..Drichlet and that issue of god sanctified murder and rape is what got me posting in these forums in the first place. Has he asked you if you'd kill someone who was raping you and your family on a weekly basis? I'm still not quite sure why weekly basis was put in there, but hey.
Btw my phones autocorrect made that nickname up and I refuse to correct it cuz its funny. Even inanimate technology doesn't take him seriously.

[fr0d0]

modalities26 hmm not so good :)

[Mystical]

Frodo according to the Bible, anything god does or commands is just and good. Drich believes what the actual teachings of the Bible say, and based on the actions and commands, favorism and demands of god: if he told you to rape or smash the skulls of babies or tear them from their mothers womb: its all peachy fine and dandy.

[fr0d0]

Did you spot me disagreeing up there MissyC??

I think we're splitting hairs over definitions. I haven't seen the origianl context, but you can see from my brief objection where I think the problem lies.

God never ever commits murder. God kills justly. He is incapable of evil. If your interpretation of his act is evil, yet the intention of the original author is different: as testified by the authors parallel description of that God as righteous and wholly good, then the onus is upon you to demonstrate the error. You don't get to state black is white without demonstrating it. That's what you want, but I require more of the subject than you do apparently.

Maybe Drich, like you, gets it wrong. Drich isn't God. He has no need to be perfect. Neither did you as a Christian.

[Kayenneh]

God never ever commits murder. God kills justly.

But Frodo, what about "Do not kill"? How isn't it hypocritical of God to kill, when he denies you it? And isn't all life sacred? Why is some people better to kill than others?