(July 22, 2013 at 4:54 am)Undeceived Wrote:It is a logical reason to help others, is it not?(July 22, 2013 at 4:38 am)pocaracas Wrote: If, for some reason, you find yourself in the need of help from a stranger, you'd want that stranger to help you, even if there's no immediate gain for that stranger... would you not?
Golden rule.
So you help others to foster a culture in which people are more likely to help you?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 9, 2024, 9:30 am
Thread Rating:
Miracles and Anti-supernaturalism
|
(July 22, 2013 at 4:54 am)Undeceived Wrote: So you help others to foster a culture in which people are more likely to help you? It's simply the reality: we're a social species, we rely on one another to survive. If we didn't co-operate, we wouldn't have the society we have now which allows us to live longer and more fulfilled lives. We're built from the ground up for this. But let's flip the script: are you telling us that you can't envision a reason to help people beyond that god wants you to? You're that morally bankrupt a person?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! RE: Miracles and Anti-supernaturalism
July 22, 2013 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2013 at 1:07 pm by Undeceived.)
(July 22, 2013 at 8:58 am)Esquilax Wrote:(July 22, 2013 at 4:54 am)Undeceived Wrote: So you help others to foster a culture in which people are more likely to help you? If there is no God, the only reason to help people is if the action --in some way, at some point-- serves me. How is that moral? (July 22, 2013 at 1:06 pm)Undeceived Wrote: If there is no God, the only reason to help people is if the action --in some way, at some point-- serves me. How is that moral? I find that most religions appeal to this part of our nature as well, offering a (very desirable) reward for following certain rules of behavior and offering a (terrifyingly horrible) punishment for refusing to follow those rules.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould (July 22, 2013 at 1:06 pm)Undeceived Wrote:(July 22, 2013 at 8:58 am)Esquilax Wrote: It's simply the reality: we're a social species, we rely on one another to survive. If we didn't co-operate, we wouldn't have the society we have now which allows us to live longer and more fulfilled lives. We're built from the ground up for this. A belief in the Atonement and Resurrection of Christ is still self-serving, for it gets you to Candy Mountain, and all the nay-sayers go to Mordor. (July 22, 2013 at 1:06 pm)Undeceived Wrote: If there is no God, the only reason to help people is if the action --in some way, at some point-- serves me. How is that moral? But aren't you only doing good to show your god how devoted you are and how much you love him? In other words, you do good only because it does serve you.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
(July 21, 2013 at 4:42 pm)Chas Wrote:I'm glad. I think it is easier to love others when one's heart is overflowing with God's love and joy.(July 21, 2013 at 4:03 pm)BettyG Wrote: Not true. Good deeds are a response to faith. We do them, not just because God commanded us to or that God will reward them, but because we are grateful for what God has done. Doing charitable works helps us to grow in virtue. One cannot say one is kind unless one does kind acts. Same for patience, prudence, justice, etc. You really can't say you have faith in God and then not do what He commanded. (July 22, 2013 at 9:07 pm)BettyG Wrote:(July 21, 2013 at 4:42 pm)Chas Wrote: Yes, but I'm an atheist and do good deeds. No gods are required.I'm glad. I think it is easier to love others when one's heart is overflowing with God's love and joy. If you need something to make it easier for you, then ok, i'm glad you have that something. I don't need it, I wouldn't assume that others need it, if you weren't implying this, then I apologize, but if you were, then please don't. (July 22, 2013 at 2:11 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(July 22, 2013 at 1:06 pm)Undeceived Wrote: If there is no God, the only reason to help people is if the action --in some way, at some point-- serves me. How is that moral? This is where you seem to go off track with Christians, we do not do it for ourselves, we do things for others because they are in need and thus it's a witness for God. It shows how He's at work in our lives, we help others with selflessness, we expect nothing in return.... hopefully most of the time we're human after all. We are to imitate Christ's walk on earth, serving others selflessly.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)