Security Updates
July 10, 2013 at 6:24 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2013 at 6:58 pm by Tiberius.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 5:25 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Security Updates
|
So.... if I send a post to the forum the CIA cannot intercept it because its encrypted? But, if they wait a microsecond they can read it on the forum in plain English?
(July 10, 2013 at 7:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote: So.... if I send a post to the forum the CIA cannot intercept it because its encrypted? But, if they wait a microsecond they can read it on the forum in plain English?Posts they can obviously read, but not private messages, things you might post in restricted forums, your password, etc. Plenty of things that you enter on these forums are private and shouldn't be intercepted by anyone.
I guess I just don't think that the authorities would feel I was all that interesting.
My server... which uses a bogus free certificate and gets no traffic, apart from myself... and has everything on default... got rated F, unless we ignore the "trust issues" (which arise from the bogus free certificate - And I do trust myself).... then I get an A:
- Protocol support: 90% - Key Exchange: 80% - Cipher Strength: 90% Not too far from AF.org's 95%; 90%, 90% ![]() Come on Tib! You should do much better than my fully default Apache server with SSL! ![]() On another note: it's good to know that you care! ![]() Keep it up!
I could configure SSL to get 100% in all fields, but then it would be unusable by most web browsers.
(July 11, 2013 at 5:54 am)pocaracas Wrote: My server... which uses a bogus free certificate and gets no traffic, apart from myself... and has everything on default... got rated F, unless we ignore the "trust issues" (which arise from the bogus free certificate - And I do trust myself) Well, yeah - self-signed certificates are super bad security wise, though as long as you control both ends, keep the private key secured, and are vigilant that someone hasn't MITM'ed your ass you at least can't be snooped on (without the expenditure of possibly more computing resources than anyone has available). Nobody probably wants to, in any case.
The problem with self signed certificates is that without already knowing the details of the keys being used, you can't know whether you are being subject to a MITM attack.
Signed keys aren't much better mind. At most, they are pseudo security.
True, which is why I said that as long as he controls both ends (therefore knowing details about the keys) he'd be OK. Probably.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Two Rule Updates | Tiberius | 124 | 35865 |
October 29, 2016 at 5:49 pm Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
| Preaching Rule Changes & Punishment Updates | Tiberius | 15 | 10265 |
October 25, 2012 at 5:34 pm Last Post: Creed of Heresy |
|
| SSL Updates | Tiberius | 1 | 2136 |
August 15, 2012 at 12:04 pm Last Post: Napoléon |
|
| Donation Updates | Tiberius | 14 | 9416 |
March 30, 2012 at 6:00 pm Last Post: Tiberius |
|
| Domain Name Updates | Tiberius | 4 | 2994 |
March 6, 2012 at 4:44 pm Last Post: Minimalist |
|
| Important Updates | Tiberius | 28 | 35972 |
January 29, 2012 at 3:06 pm Last Post: Tiberius |
|
| Donation Updates | Tiberius | 5 | 6073 |
January 17, 2012 at 1:05 pm Last Post: popeyespappy |
|
| Forum Layout Updates & Debate Motions | Tiberius | 6 | 4464 |
November 22, 2010 at 2:07 am Last Post: Ryft |
|
| Server Updates | Tiberius | 0 | 2212 |
May 13, 2010 at 6:59 pm Last Post: Tiberius |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)







