Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 5:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Security Updates
#1
Security Updates
Reply
#2
RE: Security Updates
[Image: BAsaBZJ.jpg]
Reply
#3
RE: Security Updates
So.... if I send a post to the forum the CIA cannot intercept it because its encrypted? But, if they wait a microsecond they can read it on the forum in plain English?
Reply
#4
RE: Security Updates
(July 10, 2013 at 7:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote: So.... if I send a post to the forum the CIA cannot intercept it because its encrypted? But, if they wait a microsecond they can read it on the forum in plain English?
Posts they can obviously read, but not private messages, things you might post in restricted forums, your password, etc. Plenty of things that you enter on these forums are private and shouldn't be intercepted by anyone.
Reply
#5
RE: Security Updates
I guess I just don't think that the authorities would feel I was all that interesting.

Big Grin
Reply
#6
RE: Security Updates
My server... which uses a bogus free certificate and gets no traffic, apart from myself... and has everything on default... got rated F, unless we ignore the "trust issues" (which arise from the bogus free certificate - And I do trust myself).... then I get an A:
- Protocol support: 90%
- Key Exchange: 80%
- Cipher Strength: 90%

Not too far from AF.org's 95%; 90%, 90% Tongue
Come on Tib! You should do much better than my fully default Apache server with SSL! Tongue

On another note: it's good to know that you care! Smile
Keep it up!
Reply
#7
RE: Security Updates
I could configure SSL to get 100% in all fields, but then it would be unusable by most web browsers.
Reply
#8
RE: Security Updates
(July 11, 2013 at 5:54 am)pocaracas Wrote: My server... which uses a bogus free certificate and gets no traffic, apart from myself... and has everything on default... got rated F, unless we ignore the "trust issues" (which arise from the bogus free certificate - And I do trust myself)

Well, yeah - self-signed certificates are super bad security wise, though as long as you control both ends, keep the private key secured, and are vigilant that someone hasn't MITM'ed your ass you at least can't be snooped on (without the expenditure of possibly more computing resources than anyone has available). Nobody probably wants to, in any case. Big Grin
Reply
#9
RE: Security Updates
The problem with self signed certificates is that without already knowing the details of the keys being used, you can't know whether you are being subject to a MITM attack.

Signed keys aren't much better mind. At most, they are pseudo security.
Reply
#10
RE: Security Updates
True, which is why I said that as long as he controls both ends (therefore knowing details about the keys) he'd be OK. Probably.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Two Rule Updates Tiberius 124 35865 October 29, 2016 at 5:49 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Preaching Rule Changes & Punishment Updates Tiberius 15 10265 October 25, 2012 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: Creed of Heresy
  SSL Updates Tiberius 1 2136 August 15, 2012 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: Napoléon
  Donation Updates Tiberius 14 9416 March 30, 2012 at 6:00 pm
Last Post: Tiberius
  Domain Name Updates Tiberius 4 2994 March 6, 2012 at 4:44 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Important Updates Tiberius 28 35972 January 29, 2012 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: Tiberius
  Donation Updates Tiberius 5 6073 January 17, 2012 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Forum Layout Updates & Debate Motions Tiberius 6 4464 November 22, 2010 at 2:07 am
Last Post: Ryft
  Server Updates Tiberius 0 2212 May 13, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)