I care! I know lots of people who do.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 7:57 am
Thread Rating:
|
British royal family = BORING
|
Actually, there's been a lot of betting about what the kid's name will be. I've gone with Kong. Ok, it might not be funny right now, but in a few decades time...
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
No, EDWARD! He must be named Edward! I want a Potato King!
 (July 23, 2013 at 7:59 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: I never thought I`d write this. Me too, and I'm British. Trouble is, being a British republican is like being a gay Muslim, very unpopular, and liable to get you lynched if the royalists find you. 
I must say I'm pleased to have read she had the baby naturally. Kate's not too Posh to push. And he's a big guy for a first baby, 8lbs 6oz. I find this info more interesting than the station he was born into.
 RE: British royal family = BORING
July 23, 2013 at 11:13 am
(This post was last modified: July 23, 2013 at 11:17 am by Anomalocaris.)
I'm british and fail to see why one rich woman squeezing out a pup is more important than hundreds of "ordinary" women doing the same thing every day. (I was very excited when my kids were born, but didn't expect anyone else to be too interested)
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.
Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it! 
Still waiting for the news, "extra extra Royal Family is completely infertile" over here.
THEN let me see what they think of not letting adopted children be in their lineage! RE: British royal family = BORING
July 23, 2013 at 11:45 am
(This post was last modified: July 23, 2013 at 11:51 am by Anomalocaris.)
(July 23, 2013 at 11:19 am)zebo-the-fat Wrote: I'm british and fail to see why one rich woman squeezing out a pup is more important than hundreds of "ordinary" women doing the same thing every day. Because your fellow countrymen indulge the sense of self-importance of that one inbred family? (July 23, 2013 at 11:26 am)Walking Void Wrote: Still waiting for the news, "extra extra Royal Family is completely infertile" over here. Well, this current British royal line was drudged from Saxony. If it becomes extinct, then tradition would call for some more drudging of the bottom of the barrel for the residues from other inbred, previously royal, lineages from the rest of Europe to keep the royal circus in London going.  Quote:Because your fellow countrymen indulge the sense of self-importance of that one inbred family? Actually it's people from all over the world, and I'm British and as I just said in the thread opener I don't know anyone who is interested in the royal family, the way you talk in most threads it's like you hate British people for some reason. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
