Unanswered questions

[Edwardo Piet]

Do you consider sexual madness a religion? If so, can I ask you a question on it? It's religious and personal.

[fr0d0]

Do you consider sexual madness a religion? If so, can I ask you a question on it? It's religious and personal.

Just ask Mike. We're all ears* :p

* fr0d0 hopes this isn't offensive to SM believers

[Edwardo Piet]

Don't worry, nothing is too offensive in our religion, but some things aren't offensive enough.

And that post wasn't offensive enough.

Did I ever tell you how great I was? Anyway.....

I worship the God of SM, this God is me and he is sexually obsessed. I am an arrogant cunt.... who personally wishes to worship me?

[fr0d0]

I just want details Mike

[The Reality Salesman01]

Are their any personal/religious questions that any of you felt like I wasn't able to answer or perhaps a topic I seemed to have forgotten or dropped?
I have been really busy these last few months and have not been able to see ever line of questioning to its end. So if there is anything I missed here would be a good place To post whatever question you may have.

If you believe that God's powers and properties are beyond man's ability to comprehend, then, why is it that when we ask you how you know God exists, every example you give -- of course -- is based upon things that are within our capabilities to understand?

[Drich]

Why do you insist that you believe in utter nonsense? Who are you trying to impress?

You minnie, I am here for you.

---

Can I ask without being bombarded with the illogical A/S/K?

depends on the question and whether or not the biblical answer revolves around A/S/K. If not I will look to rephrase.

---

@ Drich, hey man you see how they are, it's not about learning, it's about winning, and they'er not going to give you a new shot at bringing truth on subjects they know they can't win, and these are the very people who say to learn and reason out things, I say Ha!

GC

The fact that we have gotten to this point says they have already learned alot. For if it is as you say and they know they can't win, they have to know the position I am repersenting. Which was not the case 16 months ago.

Some do argue for the sake of arguing, while others truly seek explaination. And there are those who seek explaination through seemingly pointless arguements. Many of them have been let down by the church and by Christianity (as a religious expression of Faith) and this anti social behavior is a way to sift and judge who can be trusted. The longer someone has been seperated from the Body the deeper the pain, which results in more anger and hostility. Some can be saved from this anger and pain while others embrace it and make it apart of thier personality. I am not here to judge who is salvageable and who is not. Mine is to put the gift I have been given into service.

---

How do you go through life believing in things without evidence?

I don't. Or rather why do you assume I do not have evidence of God? Because He has not revealed Himself to you personally? Or is not detectiable by the method in which you have placed all of your faith? What if your dated method of observation limits your understanding to the physical world? We already know that science can not explain all ways in which fundemental principles work. Like graveity. We know it works differently on a Micro level than it does Macro level, but we do not understand why. Why? Maybe Because we are using a 400 year old understanding of how 'modern' men observe the world around them. If this 400 'modern' method of observation can not be used to explain something we have been working to understand since Newton first threory on the matter, Then I would conclude this 'method' is incomplete, and is only good for what we can tangably interact with. Which in of itself take a tremendous leap of faith to conclude that the entire universe can be explained using this method. Let alone any possiablity of extra deminsional life.

Like, how do you decide which things to believe and which things not to believe without using logic?

What 'proof' have you based this assumption on? Or have you made a 'faith' based desision that my experience is like your experience of God? If you have made a faith based accusation I would like to know: how do you decide which things to believe and which things not to believe without using logic

Does it depend on who says it? Or does it just depend on whether or not you like a story or idea?

God has reached out to me personally because I A/S/K and continue to do so.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-15622.html
http://atheistforums.org/thread-13378.html

---

Are their any personal/religious questions that any of you felt like I wasn't able to answer or perhaps a topic I seemed to have forgotten or dropped?
I have been really busy these last few months and have not been able to see ever line of questioning to its end. So if there is anything I missed here would be a good place To post whatever question you may have.

If you believe that God's powers and properties are beyond man's ability to comprehend, then, why is it that when we ask you how you know God exists, every example you give -- of course -- is based upon things that are within our capabilities to understand?

I never said we can not understand/comperhend God. I have in the past said we can not possiable hope to understand all aspects of God. Just by our finite nature and His Infinite beginf we simply do not have the capasity to understand all of Him. That said He has made a portion of Himself knowable to us. In this portion we have the oppertunity to have all of our questions answered.

[The Reality Salesman01]

So, I asked you this:

If you believe that God's powers and properties are beyond man's ability to comprehend, then, why is it that when we ask you how you know God exists, every example you give -- of course -- is based upon things that are within our capabilities to understand?

instead of answering the question I had about you doing this very thing...you just did it again.

we can not possiable hope to understand all aspects of God.

This is literally the exact thing my question was pertaining to. Try again.

[Faith No More]

The fact that we have gotten to this point says they have already learned alot. For if it is as you say and they know they can't win, they have to know the position I am repersenting. Which was not the case 16 months ago.

All we have learned is the depth to which your delusions reach.

[The Reality Salesman01]

The fact that we have gotten to this point says they have already learned alot. For if it is as you say and they know they can't win, they have to know the position I am repersenting. Which was not the case 16 months ago.

All we have learned is the depth to which your delusions reach.

I'm not sure we've hit rock bottom just yet. Stand by!

[Fidel_Castronaut]

@ Drich, hey man you see how they are, it's not about learning, it's about winning, and they'er not going to give you a new shot at bringing truth on subjects they know they can't win, and these are the very people who say to learn and reason out things, I say Ha!

GC

Most of learned everything there was that 'religion' could offer us a long time ago.