Unanswered questions

[Chas]

When you say that a given paradox in the evolutionary progress of a given plant that i point out, is an attribute to a genetic mutation,and yet you provide absolutly no proof such a mutation has been specifically identified and so labled. your appeal to genetic mutation becomes an appeal to faith. Because what is happening is that I have provided a paradox you can not solve in the theory as you understand it. So rather than further discuss you dismiss to genetic mutation. This again with out documented proof such a mutation exists, your efforts can be likened to a theist who simply answers 'God works in mysterious ways.' Your default to mutation is an appeal to faith. Not faith in God but faith in science,in that such a mutation does indeed exist. Which means, your laziness to look up whether such a mutation exists or not says you either do not care about what is being discussed, we have reached your potential limit of what is being discussed, or that your indeed a man of faith.

I don't like calling people stupid, so I have left two options on the table. Lazy or man of faith. I don't think your lazy. I believe you re just a shmoe who has the capacity for blind faith. And because your faith in science is good enough for you it in turn should be good enough for me.

You should never argue with a crazy mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mind
You oughta know by now

The evidence is at your fingertips, just Google it.