I would now posit a new theory. Given the data, it appears that ignorance generates stupidity. seems legit to me 
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 5:44 am
Thread Rating:
|
Can raw energy create Order
|
LastPoet
 Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)  Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione  (September 14, 2013 at 6:40 am)Rationalman Wrote: The points in that article are irrelevant to evolution. You want abiogenesis, look that upYeah. And you can look it up in a college evolution textbook. Most of them have a chapter on abiogenesis. But they're two completely different things. Really...I mean it. 
Bad Wolf
Compulsive procrastinator Religious Views: Agnostic atheist, anti-theist, whovian, misanthrope? (September 14, 2013 at 11:34 am)John V Wrote: Yeah. And you can look it up in a college evolution textbook. Most of them have a chapter on abiogenesis. But they're two completely different things. Really...I mean it. Abiogenesis concerns the appearance of life from non organic molecules. Evolution theory concerns the change of organisms over time. They are not related theories in any way. Sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain
'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House “Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom "If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
LastPoet
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm) Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Premise: Abiogenesis is incomplete.
Therefore: It must have been god. Beautifull, a pig wearing the finest robes... fuck me...  (September 14, 2013 at 11:34 am)John V Wrote:(September 14, 2013 at 6:40 am)Rationalman Wrote: The points in that article are irrelevant to evolution. You want abiogenesis, look that upYeah. And you can look it up in a college evolution textbook. Most of them have a chapter on abiogenesis. But they're two completely different things. Really...I mean it. Which textbook are you referring to? 
Doesn't matter. General handwaving in the direction of textbooks in general is more than enough to substantiate his assertion. For the credulous and the already convinced, anyway. That's the grist to the creationist rumour mill.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 (September 14, 2013 at 11:34 am)John V Wrote:(September 14, 2013 at 6:40 am)Rationalman Wrote: The points in that article are irrelevant to evolution. You want abiogenesis, look that upYeah. And you can look it up in a college evolution textbook. Most of them have a chapter on abiogenesis. But they're two completely different things. Really...I mean it. Abiogenesis is of peripheral relevance to evolution at best, because we know evolution is reality. Whether or not abiogenesis is, won't change that. Just because abiogenesis has not been confirmed doesn't mean we should put a chapter on "magical deity snapped supernatural fingers and stuff lived" as a placeholder.  RE: Can raw energy create Order
September 14, 2013 at 6:16 pm
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2013 at 6:20 pm by MindForgedManacle.)
There's no such thing as 'raw energy'.
(September 14, 2013 at 11:34 am)John V Wrote:(September 14, 2013 at 6:40 am)Rationalman Wrote: The points in that article are irrelevant to evolution. You want abiogenesis, look that upYeah. And you can look it up in a college evolution textbook. Most of them have a chapter on abiogenesis. But they're two completely different things. Really...I mean it. ...Okay, no. Practically every mathematics textbook I've ever owned had a few small chapters on formal logic, but they are not one and the same. Go be stupid in another thread. :l
Some might say he does.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 RE: Can raw energy create Order
September 14, 2013 at 6:50 pm
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2013 at 6:52 pm by Simon Moon.)
(September 14, 2013 at 11:34 am)John V Wrote: Yeah. And you can look it up in a college evolution textbook. Most of them have a chapter on abiogenesis. But they're two completely different things. Really...I mean it. I know I am late to the party concerning this bit of stupidity, but I just can't help myself anyway. Hell, I didn't get too much sleep last night, so I need an easy target today. Evolution does NOT explain the origins of life, only the diversity of life once it already exists. It's not natures fault that abiogenesis is a more rational hypothesis than your pet god idea. Everything within our current understanding of chemistry points to the probability that life began from nonliving organic molecules. Scientists from the Scripps Institute created self replicating RNA enzymes, that evolve, several years ago. It was done again in Cambridge in the UK. Self replicating RNA enzymes were the precursors to RNA, which is the precursor to DNA. So, it would seem science produced actual evidence for abiogenesis. Still waiting for same for your god..... You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Energy created nor destroyed. | uniquepegasister | 63 | 12231 |
August 9, 2015 at 5:23 pm Last Post: Ravenshire |
|
| WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER... | ronedee | 306 | 77200 |
January 30, 2015 at 11:47 am Last Post: Huggy Bear |
|
| In order for Jesus to change your soul first he has to break your spirit. | Zidneya | 6 | 2574 |
August 1, 2014 at 2:18 am Last Post: Minimalist |
|
| Christian bigots sell out their own moral commandments in order to preach to gays. | Esquilax | 22 | 5617 |
July 13, 2014 at 7:23 am Last Post: John V |
|
|
Why did God create the universe? | Tea Earl Grey Hot | 233 | 112168 |
November 12, 2013 at 8:07 am Last Post: TheBeardedDude |
| Have any women you've known ever followed the biblical order in Lev.15? | Brakeman | 12 | 5085 |
September 5, 2013 at 11:50 am Last Post: Captain Colostomy |
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
