Posts: 192
Threads: 2
Joined: September 23, 2013
Reputation:
4
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 5, 2013 at 9:43 pm
(October 5, 2013 at 9:41 pm)KichigaiNeko Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 5:50 pm)Darwinian Wrote: I wonder what the next thread in this fascinating series will be. Probably a 12 paragraph dissertation on how the theory of gravity is impossible and really it's God's love that is holding all matter together.
Que STGOF jumping out of multi-story wind to prove "faith in god"
Well, won't be any posts after the jump takes place.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 5, 2013 at 9:48 pm
Yay.,,,,,,,
Posts: 31905
Threads: 205
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 5, 2013 at 10:22 pm
Posts: 5598
Threads: 112
Joined: July 16, 2012
Reputation:
74
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 2:23 am
Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 3:05 am
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 3:49 am
(October 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Thank you for the picture.
Tuff 8: 3.46 +- 0.12 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.56 +- 0.2 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.78 +- 0.04 Ma
So they could be
Tuff 8: 3.58 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.36 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.74 Ma
So Tuff 7 could be younger than the layer above.
So they could be out of order.
That picture proved the topic's post.
So essentially, you picked some numbers out of your ass, randomly applied them to create a logically untenable conclusion, and somehow this is supposed to make science look silly?
I can do that too, you know: Man is created in god's image, god is depicted as having a beard, I don't have a beard, and therefore god doesn't exist.
You can prove practically anything if you're allowed to use the language in a sufficiently elastic manner, but that doesn't mean you've reached a correct conclusion.
Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 4:01 am
Or:
God made man in his own image.
Man originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago.
Conclusion:
Whatever else God is he sure ain't white.
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 6:21 am
(October 6, 2013 at 3:49 am)Esquilax Wrote: (October 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Thank you for the picture.
Tuff 8: 3.46 +- 0.12 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.56 +- 0.2 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.78 +- 0.04 Ma
So they could be
Tuff 8: 3.58 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.36 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.74 Ma
So Tuff 7 could be younger than the layer above.
So they could be out of order.
That picture proved the topic's post.
So essentially, you picked some numbers out of your ass, randomly applied them to create a logically untenable conclusion, and somehow this is supposed to make science look silly?
I can do that too, you know: Man is created in god's image, god is depicted as having a beard, I don't have a beard, and therefore god doesn't exist.
You can prove practically anything if you're allowed to use the language in a sufficiently elastic manner, but that doesn't mean you've reached a correct conclusion.
I used the numbers is the picture. I just applied the +- in a way consistent with the range. It did show that the interpretation of the layers could be false.
Posts: 12512
Threads: 202
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
107
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 6:25 am
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 6:29 am
(October 6, 2013 at 6:21 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: I used the numbers is the picture. I just applied the +- in a way consistent with the range. It did show that the interpretation of the layers could be false.
Then you'll have no trouble explaining what basis you used to select those numbers, and why you'd apply a different error bar for different layers. Hop to it.
|
