Posts: 965
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 13, 2014 at 2:06 am
(June 11, 2014 at 9:38 am)Chas Wrote: (June 9, 2014 at 11:47 pm)snowtracks Wrote: that the moon formation event and the moon itself provides the earth with 1. magnetic field, 2. radioactivity to drive plate tectonics, 3. stabilizes the earth's axial tilt, thus avoiding the chaotic zone - http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v36...615a0.html - all three are vital to advanced life.
#1 and #2 are simply not true.
Earth's magnetic field is driven by its molten iron core which was there before the collision.
And the same for radioactivity. Those heavy elements were already present.
The collision would have been a glancing blow and involved only the crust and mantle.
had some metals, but not enough for magnetic field or to form land masses.
"In the collision, both cores ended up in the center of Earth" pg264http://www.think-downloads.com/download/Space/Universe/rare_earth_why_complex_life_is_uncommon_in_the_universe.pdf
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 13, 2014 at 8:03 am
(June 13, 2014 at 2:06 am)snowtracks Wrote: (June 11, 2014 at 9:38 am)Chas Wrote: #1 and #2 are simply not true.
Earth's magnetic field is driven by its molten iron core which was there before the collision.
And the same for radioactivity. Those heavy elements were already present.
The collision would have been a glancing blow and involved only the crust and mantle.
had some metals, but not enough for magnetic field or to form land masses.
"In the collision, both cores ended up in the center of Earth" pg264http://www.think-downloads.com/download/Space/Universe/rare_earth_why_complex_life_is_uncommon_in_the_universe.pdf
That idea is a very, very minority opinion. It is tediously anthropocentric.
It also assumes an impact for which there is no evidence; the evidence points to a glancing blow not involving the cores.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Posts: 965
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 13, 2014 at 11:43 pm
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 14, 2014 at 7:07 am
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Posts: 965
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 14, 2014 at 6:28 pm
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
