Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[Alex K]

Not even the crazy fundies, as long as we are talking about people that function on some level, reject science entirely,whether they admit it or not. It's always degrees of picking and choosing.

[Angrboda]

Horse feathers?

[Tonus]

Horse feathers?

No idea where I got that from. (therefore, god?)

[Cyberman]

Horse feathers?

Duck Soup.

[snowtracks]

For some, faith in science is a subliminal belief in God for science is the study of how He did it.

No it isn't. Stop talking shit would you?

Your 'chip-on-the-shoulder' atheistic style has been completely kicked-to-the-curb. I previously commented that Dawkins' attitude, articles, books were looking 'clownish' which this article points out, So much for the militant atheist movement.  http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/8885...w-atheism/

[ignoramus]

Stimbo, you're not one of the blessed few, you have no meaning in your life, you do not look forward to the next life, you're 98.5% monkey, no moral compass, just a lost cause. No wonder you've got a chip on your shoulder!  Hehe.

[robvalue]

Actually, god just means science. It's another word for it.

I can make meaningless baseless assertions too.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

No it isn't. Stop talking shit would you?

Your 'chip-on-the-shoulder' atheistic style has been completely kicked-to-the-curb. I previously commented that Dawkins' attitude, articles, books were looking 'clownish' which this article points out, So much for the militant atheist movement.  http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/8885...w-atheism/

The only clown in this thread is you, Krusty. Telling me i've got a chip on my solider might be true, but it doesn't detract from the fact you are still and continually talking 'shit'.

Atheism has precisely fuck all to do with science, so again, stop talking shit about things you haven't got the foggiest clue about. Dawkins was/is a brilliant evolutionary biologist above and beyond an atheist talking head. What the spectator (as if you've ever heard of the Spectator. Google search for cherry picking much?) thinks about his articles/attitudes means fuck all to me. Maybe you should actually engage in learning about science instead of simply trashing it? After all, you reap the benefits of scientific discovery and inquiry every day of your life. You're no better than a parasite if all you do is leach off it's discoveries and give nothing but contempt and ignorance back.

Until you can demonstrate that you know what the fuck you're talking about, and about what the above article has to do with science and this 'subliminal belief in god' you can jog right the fuck on.

[downbeatplumb]

Yeah, people from all over the world are using a vast interconnected network of computers to discuss how our judgement is clouded with the looking glass of science.

For some, faith in science is a subliminal belief in God for science is the study of how He did it.

Science by it's very nature, does not require faith.
It can be checked out.
Stop trying to drag us down to your level.

[snowtracks]

---

Your 'chip-on-the-shoulder' atheistic style has been completely kicked-to-the-curb. I previously commented that Dawkins' attitude, articles, books were looking 'clownish' which this article points out, So much for the militant atheist movement.  http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/8885...w-atheism/

---

The only clown in this thread is you, Krusty. Telling me i've got a chip on my solider might be true, but it doesn't detract from the fact you are still and continually talking 'shit'.

Atheism has precisely fuck all to do with science, so again, stop talking shit about things you haven't got the foggiest clue about. Dawkins was/is a brilliant evolutionary biologist above and beyond an atheist talking head. What the spectator (as if you've ever heard of the Spectator. Google search for cherry picking much?) thinks about his articles/attitudes means fuck all to me. Maybe you should actually engage in learning about science instead of simply trashing it? After all, you reap the benefits of scientific discovery and inquiry every day of your life. You're no better than a parasite if all you do is leach off it's discoveries and give nothing but contempt and ignorance back.

Until you can demonstrate that you know what the fuck you're talking about, and about what the above article has to do with science and this 'subliminal belief in god' you can jog right the fuck on.

Was wondering about this: if one's fellow motorist leaves their turn signals on, would it be good communicative methodology to look at them while pulsating your pincher fingers (thumb & forefinger) rapidly up and down when you drive by them?