Question for Christian Ballbags here

[Waratah]

I asked you not to answer here so our discussion is not spread over 4 threads. Could you please reply to this post here as you clearly stated that you would by saying

Or is the above a lie?

(My Bolding)I could be wrong but is the bolded part in relation to our discussion which you seem to want to spread over 4 threads?

Tip: Stop lying and I will stop calling you a liar.

Example:


The above is a lie. Prove otherwise if you can and I will retract the last sentence.

I hate to use the word stupid but your ignorance is well beyond being un informed. We are well into stupidity at this point. My "I have conceded" post you quoted IS In Of Itself, An Example of a concession!! Or do you not know what the word conceded or concession means?

Name calling again. Avoiding a question.

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before. This is why I have asked you where you have conceded before. So I cannot retract my statement because you have not proven your case. You still are a liar.

Concession is the act of conceding
Conceded is the past tense of concede.

I think the above shows what is meant by concession and conceded.

I asked you not to answer here so our discussion is not spread over 4 threads. Could you please reply to this post here as you clearly stated that you would by saying

I am more than happy to continue one subject at a time flaming Poe or not.

Here is the question again that you avoided(funny that, not).

Or is the above a lie? If the above is not a lie then continue the discussion in the other thread.

[Drich]

I hate to use the word stupid but your ignorance is well beyond being un informed. We are well into stupidity at this point. My "I have conceded" post you quoted IS In Of Itself, An Example of a concession!! Or do you not know what the word conceded or concession means?

Name calling again. Avoiding a question.

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before. This is why I have asked you where you have conceded before. So I cannot retract my statement because you have not proven your case. You still are a liar.

Concession is the act of conceding
Conceded is the past tense of concede.

I think the above shows what is meant by concession and conceded.

I asked you not to answer here so our discussion is not spread over 4 threads. Could you please reply to this post here as you clearly stated that you would by saying

I am more than happy to continue one subject at a time flaming Poe or not.

Here is the question again that you avoided(funny that, not).

Or is the above a lie? If the above is not a lie then continue the discussion in the other thread.

You have demonstrated that you are not looking for a resolution for anything. You just want to be angry and name call. Fore even a flaming Poe would have accepted my resignation to him on the subject of friend or neighbor. We can not proceed because your half of this arguement will not allow it to proceed. I am willing but you are not. I only retain the ability to move 1/2 of the conversation. I made that effort several times. I have conceded the friend or neighbor several times now, so you can make your arguement, and yet you wish to remain here so you can call me names. If this is all you have then there is nothing new I can respond to.

[Waratah]

Name calling again. Avoiding a question.

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before. This is why I have asked you where you have conceded before. So I cannot retract my statement because you have not proven your case. You still are a liar.

Concession is the act of conceding
Conceded is the past tense of concede.

I think the above shows what is meant by concession and conceded.

I asked you not to answer here so our discussion is not spread over 4 threads. Could you please reply to this post here as you clearly stated that you would by saying

Here is the question again that you avoided(funny that, not).

Or is the above a lie? If the above is not a lie then continue the discussion in the other thread.

You have demonstrated that you are not looking for a resolution for anything. You just want to be angry and name call. Fore even a flaming Poe would have accepted my resignation to him on the subject of friend or neighbor.

If you wanted to find resolution you would actually go to the correct thread and answer my questions as I have asked. I am keen you are not. You ignore my questions and posts. You make false and misleading statements. I am demonstrating to you that I want resolution to my questions through my patience and my persistence in repeating the questions that you ignore.

I will ignore your angry assertion. No name calling by me. I call you something based on facts not made up shit. It was you calling me stupid when you do not understand that conceded is concede in the past tense. If you are going to name call make sure you are correct otherwise you might look like a fool.

This is from my post drich:

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before.

Do you see where I said "of course it is a concession". Do you understand what that means drich? It means I accepted your concession.

We can not proceed because your half of this arguement will not allow it to proceed. I am willing but you are not. I only retain the ability to move 1/2 of the conversation. I made that effort several times. I have conceded the friend or neighbor several times now, so you can make your arguement, and yet you wish to remain here so you can call me names. If this is all you have then there is nothing new I can respond to.

If you were really genuine with your effort then you would accept when you have either made a mistake, misled or lied. (see how fucking generous I am. I give you the option of mistake when really all I get most of the time is dishonesty.)

Since I have acknowledged your concession the first time that you answered my question of asking for prove of the so called previous concession. You can now move forward to my post HERE. This is either the 3rd or 4th time that I have asked you to reply to my post in which you have said you would be happy to reply to.

Do you see now who is always stalling the discussion? It is you and I wish you would admit it. But it is your choice and your integrity.

[Drich]

You have demonstrated that you are not looking for a resolution for anything. You just want to be angry and name call. Fore even a flaming Poe would have accepted my resignation to him on the subject of friend or neighbor.

If you wanted to find resolution you would actually go to the correct thread and answer my questions as I have asked. I am keen you are not. You ignore my questions and posts. You make false and misleading statements. I am demonstrating to you that I want resolution to my questions through my patience and my persistence in repeating the questions that you ignore.

I will ignore your angry assertion. No name calling by me. I call you something based on facts not made up shit. It was you calling me stupid when you do not understand that conceded is concede in the past tense. If you are going to name call make sure you are correct otherwise you might look like a fool.

This is from my post drich:

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before.

Do you see where I said "of course it is a concession". Do you understand what that means drich? It means I accepted your concession.

We can not proceed because your half of this arguement will not allow it to proceed. I am willing but you are not. I only retain the ability to move 1/2 of the conversation. I made that effort several times. I have conceded the friend or neighbor several times now, so you can make your arguement, and yet you wish to remain here so you can call me names. If this is all you have then there is nothing new I can respond to.

If you were really genuine with your effort then you would accept when you have either made a mistake, misled or lied. (see how fucking generous I am. I give you the option of mistake when really all I get most of the time is dishonesty.)

Since I have acknowledged your concession the first time that you answered my question of asking for prove of the so called previous concession. You can now move forward to my post HERE. This is either the 3rd or 4th time that I have asked you to reply to my post in which you have said you would be happy to reply to.

Do you see now who is always stalling the discussion? It is you and I wish you would admit it. But it is your choice and your integrity.

I'm not going back to any thread until a resolution can be agreed on. Why? Because you have brought the discussion here in search of a supposed resolution. I have offered one here, and there and the other thread. None of which has been satisfactory. You argue ad nausium. Meaning you simply restate your position over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again without taking into consideration any new information unless you can incorporate it into what you have repeated so many times before. So, If you wish to continue to hijack this thread then completely hijack it. Don't just hound dog it (bark from the side lines and follow me around with no point or purpose other than to make noise.) I've conceded your point now make an arguement or let it go.

[Waratah]

If you wanted to find resolution you would actually go to the correct thread and answer my questions as I have asked. I am keen you are not. You ignore my questions and posts. You make false and misleading statements. I am demonstrating to you that I want resolution to my questions through my patience and my persistence in repeating the questions that you ignore.

I will ignore your angry assertion. No name calling by me. I call you something based on facts not made up shit. It was you calling me stupid when you do not understand that conceded is concede in the past tense. If you are going to name call make sure you are correct otherwise you might look like a fool.

This is from my post drich:

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before.

Do you see where I said "of course it is a concession". Do you understand what that means drich? It means I accepted your concession.


If you were really genuine with your effort then you would accept when you have either made a mistake, misled or lied. (see how fucking generous I am. I give you the option of mistake when really all I get most of the time is dishonesty.)

Since I have acknowledged your concession the first time that you answered my question of asking for prove of the so called previous concession. You can now move forward to my post HERE. This is either the 3rd or 4th time that I have asked you to reply to my post in which you have said you would be happy to reply to.

Do you see now who is always stalling the discussion? It is you and I wish you would admit it. But it is your choice and your integrity.

I'm not going back to any thread until a resolution can be agreed on.

We already did came to a resolution by me showing you that I acknowledged your concession.

Why? Because you have brought the discussion here in search of a supposed resolution.

No I did not. You posted something here and I challenged your statement and pacifically asked you not to respond here.

I have offered one here, and there and the other thread.

No you have not. You just keep making excuses and moving goal posts.

None of which has been satisfactory. You argue ad nausium. Meaning you simply restate your position over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again without taking into consideration any new information unless you can incorporate it into what you have repeated so many times before.

You are talking about yourself.

So, If you wish to continue to hijack this thread then completely hijack it. Don't just hound dog it (bark from the side lines and follow me around with no point or purpose other than to make noise.) I've conceded your point now make an arguement or let it go.

My argument and questions are HERE IN THIS POST.