Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 5:09 am
(November 12, 2013 at 4:36 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: I miss read it. eitherway I'm surprised you guys were as patient as your were, I could not stand him.
You were not the only one. That said, being unlikable isn't a bannable offense, nor would we ever make it one; we'll leave that level of censorship to the christian forums.
Frankly, I'm of the opinion that catfish (he's gone now, so I can safely combine the offensive variants of his name and just call him cuntfuck) was given far too many chances, given his overall level of hostility. If I'd been a mod at the time, I would have been pushing for a permaban when he got his first, two week one. As it stands, I was happy to be able to cast my vote when he presented his throat this time.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 5:20 am
(November 12, 2013 at 5:09 am)Esquilax Wrote: (November 12, 2013 at 4:36 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: I miss read it. eitherway I'm surprised you guys were as patient as your were, I could not stand him.
You were not the only one. That said, being unlikable isn't a bannable offense, nor would we ever make it one; we'll leave that level of censorship to the christian forums.
Frankly, I'm of the opinion that catfish (he's gone now, so I can safely combine the offensive variants of his name and just call him cuntfuck) was given far too many chances, given his overall level of hostility. If I'd been a mod at the time, I would have been pushing for a permaban when he got his first, two week one. As it stands, I was happy to be able to cast my vote when he presented his throat this time. ![Devil Devil](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/devil.gif)
I'm 100 per cent behind you there, though cuntfuck is far too kind of name. I think most would rather fuck a cactus hence the hostility.
In all honesty I'm surprised poet didnt nail him to the wall the first time.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 6896
Threads: 89
Joined: January 13, 2013
Reputation:
116
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 5:30 am
Cuntfish
that is all
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Posts: 5598
Threads: 112
Joined: July 16, 2012
Reputation:
74
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 6:11 am
Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 6:15 am
(November 12, 2013 at 5:30 am)missluckie26 Wrote: Cuntfish ![Big Grin Big Grin](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
that is all
Cuntfish + Catfuck = Cuntfuck.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 770
Threads: 37
Joined: November 2, 2013
Reputation:
22
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 7:54 am
It seems I missed all the fun. Oh well.
Back to the main topic, yes... Skewed priorities indeed.
-sees the word Kansas and City-
Goddammit, Kansas!
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 4:42 pm
It's only the millions of Christians in Kansas who spoil it for the other 143.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 1272
Threads: 3
Joined: July 29, 2012
Reputation:
7
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 5:40 pm
Atheists forming dedicated groups to do charity works in partnership with other religious charities is great start. We look forward to atheists spending even more time around Christians.
Posts: 31053
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 5:48 pm
(November 12, 2013 at 4:18 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: And calling cinjin and cuthlu trolls in his signature was asking to be banned.
eitherway
Meh, I really couldn't care less about that, and I'm pretty sure Cinjin gives even less fucks than I do.
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 12, 2013 at 6:30 pm
It was pretty ironic, though.
Never did figure out if he identified as a Christian or not, since some days he pretended to, and then other days he pretended not to. I think he just wanted to be argumentative either way. Maybe if he ever gets that sand out of his vagina he can find an internet forum which will take him in.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
|