Feminism is as Awful as Homophobia

[EgoRaptor]

Also, I agree with some sexual harassment laws, like no touching, but men should be able to ogle & say whatever they want about a woman.

---

Goes the other way around too. Women should be allowed ogle & say whatever they want about a man.

[Tiberius]

I'm sorry, but talking about your teacher's tits (or anyone's for that matter) is just plain rude. Have some fucking respect, you child.

Bolding mine.

I disagree. I talk about Shell B's tits all the time and that isn't rude.

[EgoRaptor]

I'm sorry, but talking about your teacher's tits (or anyone's for that matter) is just plain rude. Have some fucking respect, you child.

Bolding mine.

I disagree. I talk about Shell B's tits all the time and that isn't rude.

You disagreed with a feminist. I suppose that make you a evil rape-apologist thought-criminal. I guess that makes 2 of us!

[rexbeccarox]

Yes, Tibs. I concede :p

[The Valkyrie]

Bolding mine.

I disagree. I talk about Shell B's tits all the time and that isn't rude.

You disagreed with a feminist. I suppose that make you a evil rape-apologist thought-criminal. I guess that makes 2 of us!

Talk about stretching what was said.

Though, I suppose, as demonstrated here numerous times, name calling of people who disagree with you is the last stretch you have.

[Angrboda]

One of those rights happens to be sex with a consenting partner.

Name three feminists with published statements indicating they are against consensual sex between mature adults.

I dare you. I don't think you can do it.

If you can't, then you're just a lying, posturing, a-hole.



You lack subtlety. To you, gray is black, and black is white, and white is gray. I would hope this is just a sign of your being rather young, and somewhat immature, and that you'll grow out of it, but I have my doubts.

And I suspect there's more to the teacher story than you let on. You strike me as the type of person who would voice obscenities during class time just to get attention.

Anyway, three citations. If you can't do it, then you're full of shit.

[EgoRaptor]

One of those rights happens to be sex with a consenting partner.

Name three feminists with published statements indicating they are against consensual sex between mature adults.

I dare you. I don't think you can do it.

If you can't, then you're just a lying, posturing, a-hole.



You lack subtlety. To you, gray is black, and black is white, and white is gray. I would hope this is just a sign of your being rather young, and somewhat immature, and that you'll grow out of it, but I have my doubts.

And I suspect there's more to the teacher story than you let on. You strike me as the type of person who would voice obscenities during class time just to get attention.

Anyway, three citations. If you can't do it, then you're full of shit.

Feminists are always saying that sex is not a right. They are the ones who push for sexual harassment legislation.

And no, there is no more to the story. It wasn't me, it was someone else, wish it had been me though. That kid was badass for that.

[rexbeccarox]

rase, he's full of shit with or without the citations.

[EgoRaptor]

One of those rights happens to be sex with a consenting partner.

Name three feminists with published statements indicating they are against consensual sex between mature adults.

I dare you. I don't think you can do it.

If you can't, then you're just a lying, posturing, a-hole.



You lack subtlety. To you, gray is black, and black is white, and white is gray. I would hope this is just a sign of your being rather young, and somewhat immature, and that you'll grow out of it, but I have my doubts.

And I suspect there's more to the teacher story than you let on. You strike me as the type of person who would voice obscenities during class time just to get attention.

Anyway, three citations. If you can't do it, then you're full of shit.

Ad hominem.

---

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/features/n_9932/

In France, both the Criminal Code and the Labor Code are relevant to the issue of sexual harassment. Until May 4, 2012, article 222-33 of the French Criminal Code described sexual harassment as, "The fact of harassing anyone in order to obtain favors of a sexual nature...". Since 2002, it recognized the possibility of sexual harassment between co-workers and not only by supervisors. On May 4, 2012, the http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr (French Supreme Court) quashed the definition of the criminal code as being too vague. The 2012 decision resulted from a law on priority preliminary rulings on the issue of constitutionality. As a consequence of this decision, all pending procedures before criminal courts were cancelled. Several feminist NGOs, such as AFVT, criticized this decision.

http://www.feminist.com/resources/ourbod...ol_sh.html


Done!

[rexbeccarox]

Ego, do you have any knowledge of the history of sexual harassment and why there are laws against it? Here, I'll help you a little:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment

There are very good reasons sexual harassment laws are in place, and if you don't think so, you're a misogynistic freak.

(See? I can do ad homs too!)