I am availible to answer some questions

[thesummerqueen]

I for one think your picture is perfectly charming.
I felt a surge of indignation when I read what Menos wrote it was uncalled for he is a big meanie.

People who say uncalled for things usually are the ones with things wrong with them - not the people they insult. But I appreciate the compliment.

[*Deidre*]

I didn't get the sense that she was Christian at all. Seemed like a troll baiting people into replying.

Interesting. I have no idea.

She didn't express herself as understanding even what she was spewing. And did it arrogantly. It seemed over the top, even for a Christian zealot...so, my thought is ...just a troll, who comes to sites to get attention and reactions.

[professor]

I told you guys she was a fake.
I am really surprised you didn't perceive it after a bit.

[Rampant.A.I.]

I know what an assertion is A.I.

I just didn't see that made in the text that you quoted and bolded to prove it.

1 & 5. (see 5)
2. She said "alot of people here", not atheists and not that anyone thought that god existed. "turning your back on" is a view from her perspective, not anyone elses'
3. Again "alot of people here" isn't "Atheist"
4. Where does she say that in that post?
5. She is allowed to state her beliefs just as you are yours. She didn't state a fact for you. She stated a fact for her. We all make those kind of assertions.

If she had said "This is true and you are wrong" then you would have reason to ask for an explanation. As what she said there was colloquial for her attested belief system you could hardly class that as a declaration, contention, statement, claim, opinion, proclamation, announcement, pronouncement, protestation, avowal, or a forceful statement of fact or belief.

You can't possibly be this stupid. Here are some more non-assertions:

"Assertions Fr0d0 agrees with don't qualify as assertions"

"Unsupported assertions accepted by a group don't qualify as assertions"

"Frodo has extremely low reading comprehension, and was likely dropped repeatedly at an early age"

[fr0d0]

Interesting. I have no idea.

She didn't express herself as understanding even what she was spewing. And did it arrogantly. It seemed over the top, even for a Christian zealot...so, my thought is ...just a troll, who comes to sites to get attention and reactions.

I really don't know. I'm suspicious of everyone. I had no good reason to believe either way.

---

You can't possibly be this stupid. Here are some more non-assertions:

"Assertions Fr0d0 agrees with don't qualify as assertions"

"Unsupported assertions accepted by a group don't qualify as assertions"

"Frodo has extremely low reading comprehension, and was likely dropped repeatedly at an early age"

Stupid is as stupid says

[null--69]

Well damn, I'm late to the "party". She's banned now.

[Kayenneh]

I told you guys she was a fake.
I am really surprised you didn't perceive it after a bit.

Eh, we did. The thing is, we needed actual proof of her breaking the rules before we could ban her.

[Esquilax]

I told you guys she was a fake.
I am really surprised you didn't perceive it after a bit.

Eh, we did. The thing is, we needed actual proof of her breaking the rules before we could ban her.

The banhammer is a heavy responsibility.

[Tonus]

I told you guys she was a fake.
I am really surprised you didn't perceive it after a bit.

I prefer to take people on the web at face value, as it saves me the time of caring whether or not they are genuine or just trolling. She was either an arrogant idiot ("here to set people straight") or internet troll number 1,434,516,768 (give or take a hundred billion or so). Poe's Law reminds us that trying to separate the parody from the reality is a waste of effort.

[Kayenneh]

Poe's Law reminds us that trying to separate the parody from the reality is a waste of effort.

Tell that to yourself the day you're made moderator.. *sigh*