I believe in God: So Debate me

[Rampant.A.I.]

Is fr0d0 a Christian or a "spiritualist"(really hate that word)? I can never guess his views out

Don't worry, you're not on your own with that. And that, I think, is just how he likes it.

It's intentional, so he can shift his arguments around however he likes.

[Chas]

6. You are worthless and if eugenics was brought back you would be the first to go.

You are insane and someone should blow your head off.

See how that works? Really constructive, eh?

[MJ the Skeptical]

6. You are worthless and if eugenics was brought back you would be the first to go.

Of all people, we should experiment on the Muslims to find out why their culture is so filthy and backwards. Allah loves you so much he wants most of you to wear a towels around and to subjugate your women so they can't/won't leave you.

[iThinkImSmart]

i will debate with you ... im an atheist....

If You do not believe in the "spaghetti monster" that makes you an atheist as well ......

[topher]

i will debate with you ... im an atheist....

If You do not believe in the "spaghetti monster" that makes you an atheist as well ......

Uh, no it doesn't. Atheism is the rejection of all deities, humorous or otherwise.

[iThinkImSmart]

i will debate with you ... im an atheist....

If You do not believe in the "spaghetti monster" that makes you an atheist as well ......

Uh, no it doesn't. Atheism is the rejection of all deities, humorous or otherwise.

everyone in the world is an atheist to another god... my famous atheist teachers taught me that richard dawkins as well ....

[topher]

Uh, no it doesn't. Atheism is the rejection of all deities, humorous or otherwise.

everyone in the world is an atheist to another god... my famous atheist teachers taught me that richard dawkins as well ....

Simply not true. Theism is the belief in a God or gods. Atheism is the rejection of a belief in God or gods.

You're not an atheist of any kind if you believe in Jesus, but not Allah. You're a theist. It's not a "check 1 box" sort of thing.

I AM an atheist, but that's an old argument that doesn't really go anywhere.

[Rabb Allah]

You are now making a dumb ass fallacy as you cannot tell sarcasm from literalism.

Yep, there it is again: The Argument Ad Hominem Fallacy.

Rejecting a person's arguments on the account of them behaving stupidly and not being able to even articulate an argument is not ad hominem. You keep using philosophical terms you do not understand

---

6. You are worthless and if eugenics was brought back you would be the first to go.

Of all people, we should experiment on the Muslims to find out why their culture is so filthy and backwards. Allah loves you so much he wants most of you to wear a towels around and to subjugate your women so they can't/won't leave you.

I am perfectly fine with you experimenting on Muslims. I have so many gripes against them and their behaviour. You wanna see what Muslims do to argue? Not much different than what some atheist do.

[youtube]Kue3D71rLAM[/youtube]

Way too many Muslims at the college I attend but thankfully they are not at this level of stupidity.

---

6. You are worthless and if eugenics was brought back you would be the first to go.

You are insane and someone should blow your head off.

See how that works? Really constructive, eh?

No it is just insulting and humorous. I cannot reason with a joke.

---

Is fr0d0 a Christian or a "spiritualist"(really hate that word)? I can never guess his views out

Don't worry, you're not on your own with that. And that, I think, is just how he likes it.

You are under the impression I am a flip flopper? Oh this is humorous because although I cannot say that about you I can say that almost everyone who tries debating me just ignores what I am or am not. I have only held one position this entire time on the forum and no body seemed to be debating it but Tor. Ignore what anyone else says because the IQ level on this thread is below 30. Look at my arguments with Tor in the beginning of the thread or just ask me if you wish to actually debate on something because nobody wants to debate. I do not even claim to have the answers to anything.

Everyone else wants me to be a Muslim because it can be eaisly refuted but the issue is that I am anti-Islamic, thus not a Muslim. I am a Panendeistic Wathani Pagan to be specific. My theological views come from Deism so work with that

[Brian37]

Yep, there it is again: The Argument Ad Hominem Fallacy.

Rejecting a person's arguments on the account of them behaving stupidly and not being able to even articulate an argument is not ad hominem. You keep using philosophical terms you do not understand

---

Of all people, we should experiment on the Muslims to find out why their culture is so filthy and backwards. Allah loves you so much he wants most of you to wear a towels around and to subjugate your women so they can't/won't leave you.

I am perfectly fine with you experimenting on Muslims. I have so many gripes against them and their behaviour. You wanna see what Muslims do to argue? Not much different than what some atheist do.

[youtube]Kue3D71rLAM[/youtube]

Way too many Muslims at the college I attend but thankfully they are not at this level of stupidity.

---

You are insane and someone should blow your head off.

See how that works? Really constructive, eh?

No it is just insulting and humorous. I cannot reason with a joke.

---

Don't worry, you're not on your own with that. And that, I think, is just how he likes it.

You are under the impression I am a flip flopper? Oh this is humorous because although I cannot say that about you I can say that almost everyone who tries debating me just ignores what I am or am not. I have only held one position this entire time on the forum and no body seemed to be debating it but Tor. Ignore what anyone else says because the IQ level on this thread is below 30. Look at my arguments with Tor in the beginning of the thread or just ask me if you wish to actually debate on something because nobody wants to debate. I do not even claim to have the answers to anything.

Everyone else wants me to be a Muslim because it can be eaisly refuted but the issue is that I am anti-Islamic, thus not a Muslim. I am a Panendeistic Wathani Pagan to be specific. My theological views come from Deism so work with that

I am a Panendeistic Wathani Pagan to be specific. My theological views come from Deism so work with that

How Jeffersonian of you "I am not like the others". Yes you are. Having a different flavor of bullshit doesn't make it true.

There never was by any name, nor ever will be by any name, and cosmic thinking force driving any of this. Watered down bullshit is still bullshit.

The reality is that humans make up bullshit. The reality is that when our species goes extinct and our planet dies and our sun dies, that will be it, the universe will go on without any record of our existence or the bullshit humans make up.

Making up new bullshit to avoid old bullshit is all you are doing.

[Cyberman]

Don't worry, you're not on your own with that. And that, I think, is just how he likes it.

You are under the impression I am a flip flopper? Oh this is humorous because although I cannot say that about you I can say that almost everyone who tries debating me just ignores what I am or am not. I have only held one position this entire time on the forum and no body seemed to be debating it but Tor. Ignore what anyone else says because the IQ level on this thread is below 30. Look at my arguments with Tor in the beginning of the thread or just ask me if you wish to actually debate on something because nobody wants to debate. I do not even claim to have the answers to anything.

Everyone else wants me to be a Muslim because it can be eaisly refuted but the issue is that I am anti-Islamic, thus not a Muslim. I am a Panendeistic Wathani Pagan to be specific. My theological views come from Deism so work with that

Was it some kind of paranoid low self-esteem that prevented you from recognising that I was actually agreeing with you about your assessment of the h0bb1ty one (fr0d0, for the record) and prompted you to respond in this automatic, knee-jerk way?

I never, ever said any of the things of which you accuse me, indeed I am at a loss to see quite how my words and the context in which they occurred could possibly have been interpreted in anything approaching the manner that you seem to have done. If you intend to beat about the bush, try the other end of the stick.