Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2026, 2:00 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
#41
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 2:22 pm)Esquilax Wrote: So now that it's taken literally seven seconds to rebut the first argument- not that I think Rev will actually acknowledge or understand that- anyone want to guess what the next six arguments will be?

I'm betting we'll get the argument from design, Kalam, and the watchmaker argument.

Or, wait... was this just about evolution? Thinking

And remember, he said if we refute his seven arguments, he'll leave. I'd rather he just substantiate his claims than leave, but it leaves me to wonder, will he consider this argument refuted, or will he stick with the dishonest claim he's been swindled by?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#42
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
I sense shifting goalposts on the horizon.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#43
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:20 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I sense shifting goalposts on the horizon.
Oh, I'm sure he'll find a way to move them even farther than that.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#44
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:20 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I sense shifting goalposts on the horizon.

That would represent more effort than he has yet put into his posts. He'll stick true to form and ignore what others have said, while mindlessly repeating the same tired points he cribbed from AIG.
Reply
#45
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:30 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(April 21, 2014 at 3:20 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I sense shifting goalposts on the horizon.

That would represent more effort than he has yet put into his posts. He'll stick true to form and ignore what others have said, while mindlessly repeating the same tired points he cribbed from AIG.

Thank you for your responses. I will look at them this evening. =)
Reply
#46
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:29 pm)Tonus Wrote:
(April 21, 2014 at 3:20 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I sense shifting goalposts on the horizon.
Oh, I'm sure he'll find a way to move them even farther than that.

Not likely, he's too afraid of falling off.

[Image: flat-earth.jpg]
Reply
#47
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:42 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 21, 2014 at 3:30 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: That would represent more effort than he has yet put into his posts. He'll stick true to form and ignore what others have said, while mindlessly repeating the same tired points he cribbed from AIG.

Thank you for your responses. I will look at them this evening. =)

Better yet, why not read a book on the subject? Hell, everyone should read at least two damn books in their lives!
Reply
#48
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:42 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Thank you for your responses. I will look at them this evening. =)

A simple request, before you respond: look at your sources. Search their webpages in the "about us" section for a statement of faith.

If they even have one of those, disregard the opinions of that source. Science does not require faith, and any source that does, and displays it proudly, is not doing honest science.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#49
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:43 pm)Cato Wrote:
(April 21, 2014 at 3:29 pm)Tonus Wrote: Oh, I'm sure he'll find a way to move them even farther than that.

Not likely, he's too afraid of falling off.

[Image: flat-earth.jpg]


Come on, all bible believing Christians known the earth is at the center of the universe, where can you fall off to from there?
Reply
#50
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 21, 2014 at 3:46 pm)Esquilax Wrote: A simple request, before you respond: look at your sources. Search their webpages in the "about us" section for a statement of faith.

If they even have one of those, disregard the opinions of that source. Science does not require faith, and any source that does, and displays it proudly, is not doing honest science.

Particularly disregard any sources that have anything resembling "By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record."
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kalam Cosmological argument. JJoseph 113 26391 January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Astreja
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 6682 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 38407 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics? FlatAssembler 49 11289 June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 14343 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 40061 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 11160 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 59774 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is the best counter argument against "What do you lose by believing?" Macoleco 25 5222 May 1, 2021 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Watchmaker: my fav argument zwanzig 672 188867 March 31, 2021 at 11:34 am
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)