Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:07 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 2:09 pm by Revelation777.)
(May 2, 2014 at 1:49 pm)orogenicman Wrote: (May 2, 2014 at 7:58 am)orogenicman Wrote: I have seen your rebuttals, and they do not address anything I've posted above. If you can't provide an adequate response to my rebuttal, then what's the point of pretending that you want to have a debate?
Bump
It appears that you all would like me to leave this forum and not continue with my arguments? 
(May 2, 2014 at 12:02 pm)pocaracas Wrote: So, rev, which is it?
1: You lied
2: You were induced in error by your lying sources
I believe the sources I used are valid
Posts: 46067
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:10 pm
(May 2, 2014 at 2:07 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 2, 2014 at 1:49 pm)orogenicman Wrote: Bump
It appears that you all would like me to leave this forum and not continue with my arguments?
Not to speak for the other posters here, but no, I would like you to stay.
That being said, I'd also like you to admit to what an abject failure your 'Transitional Fossils' argument has been and to move on to argument #2.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:10 pm
(May 2, 2014 at 12:07 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: (May 2, 2014 at 12:01 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: your taunting is unsavory, please refrain from labeling and lets discuss matters as rational adults
You first. No one has been more childish on this thread than you.
I'm sorry you feel that way.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:10 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 2:13 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(May 2, 2014 at 2:07 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: It appears that you all would like me to leave this forum and not continue with my arguments? If you are going to continue to be obtuse, not engage, not use your own words, not use scholarly evidence, lie, misrepresent facts and our position, ignore anything contrary to your preconceived notion of what evolution/science is, quote mine, and dodge difficult questions, then yes.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:11 pm
We want you to actually argue, Rev, and not bounce around and piggyback on fallacious sources while refusing to engage with any responses that might actually pose a challenge.
Nobody here takes the idea of driving you out of the forum to be the ideal solution, but if you're finding a lot of resistance that's down to you and the way you choose to conduct yourself. I'd love it if you decided to become an active and productive member, but at the moment it's just so monumentally frustrating watching you mortgage your intellectual integrity to a bunch of hucksters, with no apparent understanding of anything you or they talk about.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 3634
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:11 pm
(May 2, 2014 at 2:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: That being said, I'd also like you to admit to what an abject failure your 'Transitional Fossils' argument has been and to move on to argument #2.
Boru
Yes, please rev777...
Time to move on to number 2.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:12 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 2:13 pm by Revelation777.)
(May 2, 2014 at 12:34 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote: Rev, take your damn fingers out your ears and listen. You have lied to us, this has been demonstrated. Please admit it and apologise for it.
I already addressed this quite a while ago. I don't wish to be redundant. Please stop trying to 
Time to move forward.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:13 pm
(May 2, 2014 at 2:07 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 2, 2014 at 12:02 pm)pocaracas Wrote: So, rev, which is it?
1: You lied
2: You were induced in error by your lying sources
I believe the sources I used are valid
They are not. You have been shown, in black and white, no fooling, honest to god objective text, where the sources you use have lied in order to misrepresent the position of a scientist. There's no way to get around it, and no mistaking it; the position they espoused was factually incorrect, and there was no way to come to the conclusion they did honestly.
I don't know how I can make this any clearer to you.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:17 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 2:17 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(May 2, 2014 at 2:13 pm)Esquilax Wrote: They are not. You have been shown, in black and white, no fooling, honest to god objective text, where the sources you use have lied in order to misrepresent the position of a scientist. There's no way to get around it, and no mistaking it; the position they espoused was factually incorrect, and there was no way to come to the conclusion they did honestly.
I don't know how I can make this any clearer to you. ![[Image: tumblr_m11s9bAvDq1qjemo2o1_400.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=amytintera.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F08%2Ftumblr_m11s9bAvDq1qjemo2o1_400.gif)
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 254
Threads: 4
Joined: February 19, 2014
Reputation:
6
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 2:18 pm
(May 2, 2014 at 2:07 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 2, 2014 at 1:49 pm)orogenicman Wrote: Bump
It appears that you all would like me to leave this forum and not continue with my arguments?
(May 2, 2014 at 12:02 pm)pocaracas Wrote: So, rev, which is it?
1: You lied
2: You were induced in error by your lying sources
I believe the sources I used are valid
It's NOT valid. Do you understand the word NOT? Damn this is annoying.
|
