Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 27, 2024, 6:10 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
Bob Kelso Offline Donators
Let me break this down for you Bob-o style.
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2029
Threads: 39
Joined: October 16, 2013
Reputation: 48
#221
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 12:36 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 11:04 am)Revelation777 Wrote:
(May 5, 2014 at 12:13 am)Aral Gamelon Wrote: [Image: 0NKzG6i.png]

Look son at the picture that is slightly crooked on the wall, pay no mind to the elephant in the room.

Holy shit, this guy gives enrico a run for his money.
[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]

(September 17, 2015 at 4:04 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I make change in the coin tendered. If you want courteous treatment, behave courteously. Preaching at me and calling me immoral is not courteous behavior.
Find
Reply
Anomalocaris Offline
Stem arthropod
*****
Religious Views: None
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation: 85
#222
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 12:45 pm (This post was last modified: May 6, 2014 at 12:46 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(May 6, 2014 at 12:36 pm)Aral Gamelon Wrote:
(May 5, 2014 at 11:04 am)Revelation777 Wrote: Look son at the picture that is slightly crooked on the wall, pay no mind to the elephant in the room.

Holy shit, this guy gives enrico a run for his money.

Not comparable. Revs strings random wishes together and call it "arguments". Enrico strings random syllables together and call it "post".
Find
Reply
Tonus Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 7155
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation: 72
#223
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 1:12 pm
Quote:Again, it is an unprovable theological assertion that God would not place the same nonfunctional sequences at the same locus in separate species. He may have a purpose for doing so that is beyond our present understanding.
Or the shorter version: "thank god for unprovable assertions."
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Find
Reply
Rampant.A.I. Offline
The sky looks pissed
***
Religious Views: Agnostic
Posts: 1946
Threads: 17
Joined: February 6, 2014
Reputation: 18
#224
Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 1:19 pm (This post was last modified: May 6, 2014 at 1:20 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(May 6, 2014 at 12:45 pm)Chuck Wrote:
(May 6, 2014 at 12:36 pm)Aral Gamelon Wrote: Holy shit, this guy gives enrico a run for his money.

Not comparable. Revs strings random wishes together and call it "arguments". Enrico strings random syllables together and call it "post".

I'm convinced Enrico randomly generates all of his posts with something like http://www.wisdomofchopra.com

Unfortunately, the random quote generator may in fact be his brain.
Find
Reply
Simon Moon Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation: 47
#225
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 2:31 pm (This post was last modified: May 6, 2014 at 2:31 pm by Simon Moon.)
(May 4, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Argument #2: Evolution of Species

The evolutionist Kerkut defined the “general theory of evolution” as “the theory that living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.” He goes on to say, “The evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.” G. A. Kerkut, Implications of Evolution (Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1960), p.157.

Kerkut made this statement in 1960.

That was 55 years ago. Evidence has passed him by, by decades.

Quote:My argument is not that change doesn’t take place within species over time. My argument is that no matter how long the time frame, there is no substantial scientific evidence that a microbe has evolved into a human being. Additionally, there is no substantial scientific evidence that non-living chemicals can produce a living cell regardless of time and/or chance.

But you're not making an argument. You're making unsupported assertions.

The people with actual credentials can explain, with evidence and not breaking any scientific laws, how this can happen.

So, again all you prove is that you got nothing.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Find
Reply
Duke Guilmon Offline
デユークギルモン
**
Religious Views: None.
Posts: 336
Threads: 32
Joined: April 23, 2014
Reputation: 20
#226
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 3:27 pm
This Micro Macro evolution argument is stupid. Seeing as You guys will move the goal post. Remember when horse evolution never could happen? I do and now all of a sudden it can.
[Image: guilmon_evolution_by_davidgtm3-d4gb5rp.gif]https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find
Reply
BrianSoddingBoru4 Offline
Power-Drunk Administrator
*******
Religious Views: Headology
Posts: 46422
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 109
#227
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 7:54 pm
(May 6, 2014 at 3:27 pm)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote: This Micro Macro evolution argument is stupid. Seeing as You guys will move the goal post. Remember when horse evolution never could happen? I do and now all of a sudden it can.

Spot on. 'Micro' and 'macro' evolution are exactly the same thing - it is a difference of degree, not of kind.

It is rather like saying, 'I believe in sugar cubes, but lorry loads of sugar are impossible.'

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Find
Reply
Lemonvariable72 Offline
Copenhagen School
****
Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher.
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation: 38
#228
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 8:28 pm
So what's argument number 3?
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Find
Reply
Jackalope Away
Elon Musk owes me money
*******
Religious Views: Absent
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation: 141
#229
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 8:36 pm
(May 6, 2014 at 8:28 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: So what's argument number 3?

Who cares? Looks like he opened with his "best" material.
Find
Reply
SteelCurtain Offline
Milk Chocolate Bimbo/Swag Master
*****
Religious Views: Atheist (6)
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation: 117
#230
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 6, 2014 at 8:40 pm
The waits between 'arguments' (read: baseless, unsupported assertions) are logarithmic. 6 days between the one and two, we're looking at three weeks and 2 rule change suggestions before we get to argument #3: If I evolved from a monkey, how come there are still monkeys?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Argument #2: Evolution Of Species

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What's your stance on bringing back extinct species? Fake Messiah 80 5217 March 12, 2024 at 8:50 am
Last Post: brewer
  New human species discovered in the Phillipines downbeatplumb 5 885 April 13, 2019 at 6:17 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Bumblebee officially added to endangered species list Silver 13 1897 July 3, 2018 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Without rape, most animal species would go extinct Alexmahone 34 5399 May 25, 2018 at 11:25 am
Last Post: sdelsolray
  Strange troglodyte species found in Turkmenistan cave Silver 4 1054 September 26, 2017 at 7:18 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  New Species Found in Oregon brewer 31 7450 February 11, 2016 at 10:34 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Do you think we could/will ever have two dominant[prime] species? Heat 11 3864 November 21, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Remains of new human species found ignoramus 32 7730 September 10, 2015 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: MTL
  Is there enough time for SPECIATION for million species drkfuture 11 6665 July 30, 2015 at 7:52 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Invasive Species IATIA 11 3086 July 17, 2015 at 7:25 pm
Last Post: rado84



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)