Posts: 12231
Threads: 324
Joined: April 14, 2011
Reputation:
140
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm
(May 25, 2014 at 1:18 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But the topic is gun deaths, not violent crimes.
For what its worth, I'll take a punch in the face over a bullet to the gut any day.
Yeah, how do we know that the vast majority of these 'violent crimes' aren't just punch ups in a bar. Seen as, y'know, Britain has a bit of a drinking problem.
Posts: 6191
Threads: 124
Joined: November 13, 2009
Reputation:
70
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 1:59 pm
I hope you enjoy more Sandyhook incidents, Creed.
Because America is not going to solve the fundamental problems that enable crime and aggression towards everyone else. It is easy to regulate who purchases firearms and what they do with it and if they are of good character and history to own it.
It is difficult to force someone to pay people a living wage that ensures that they're not desperate or living in an area that continually encourages crime.
It is also difficult, as you have seen, to get health care into common access. If we had so much shit thrown over getting universal healthcare or a shitty approximation thereof, what makes you think that we could solve a whole collection of factors that enable violent crime?
Until then, changing one thing should reduce slightly this problem because we are all too fucking immature to solve a collection of root problems.
I would like to keep guns out of the hands of clearly unstable and immature tools.
I find it funny that you would prefer the opposite.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Posts: 12231
Threads: 324
Joined: April 14, 2011
Reputation:
140
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:07 pm
(This post was last modified: May 25, 2014 at 2:08 pm by Napoléon.)
(May 25, 2014 at 1:10 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...a-U-S.html
Please, tell us more about how to be civilized.
Did nobody else bother to actually read this article?
Quote:But criminologists say crime figures can be affected by many factors, including different criminal justice systems and differences in how crime is reported and measured.
In Britain, an affray is considered a violent crime, while in other countries it will only be logged if a person is physically injured.
There are also degrees of violence. While the UK ranks above South Africa for all violent crime, South Africans suffer more than 20,000 murders each year - compared with Britain's 921 in 2007.
How do these figures have any weight in an argument about guns?
Posts: 3179
Threads: 197
Joined: February 18, 2012
Reputation:
72
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:17 pm
Also, anyone notice that shortly after the deinstitutionalization bullshit, violent crime in this country started going up? Correlation doesn't equal causation but it's something worth mulling over.
"Treat them in the community!"
Yeah! Let's let schizophrenics, psychopaths, and people with obvious sociopathic tendencies wander around openly and freely society without treatment, close observation, evaluation, and/or intervention and expect that they'll just get help by themselves when most of the time they don't think there's anything wrong with what they're thinking! How's that working for us?
Ohh...
...Not great, huh?
But hey, at least they're living on their own and not costing the taxpayers their precious fucking pennies-a-year-per-person to keep them in a medical environment where their issues are managed, treated, or at the very least mitigated, right? Who cares that a huge percentage of untreated schizophrenics end up committing suicide, an even vaster percentage end up homeless, babbling to their hallucinatory voices with no connection to the real world left to even realize what kind of situation they're in, or that schizophrenics by and large tend to have higher likelihoods of violent episodes? As long as it's NIMBY and we can spend those pennies on the American past-time of dropping pennies on the ground to the fullest extent, it's all A-OK. Because hey; we don't wanna treat someone else's problem until it becomes our own! And oh so many times it becomes our own! And yet we still don't fucking learn.
Deputies went to this psychopath's apartment after his relatives alerted the police and he had been posting Youtube videos explicitly stating his desires and plans to kill others and himself. He only had to tell them it was a "misunderstanding," and ta-da! Psychopath kept his civil liberties! Granted, those civil liberties of his cost six innocent girls their lives, but hey! As long as we protect the rights of people who are fucked in the head, right?
This coming from a guy who has a laundry list of emotional and personality disorders. If institutionalization was a thing, and I had to be taken into an institution for a year to address and treat at least some of them, I'd be happy to get psychiatric and psychological treatment at no cost to me. It'd be the only way I could, in fact; I sure as fuck don't have the money to go through the years of outpatient treatment I'm gonna need to go through to deal with all my ghosts and demons.
Look, I'm just saying, the hands-off approach to mental illnesses is not fucking working, and this massacre is a fine fucking example. My schizo roomie is another prime example. He's barely in touch with reality and in the year and a half I've known him, I've only seen his mental state slowly declining further and his grip on reality is slipping steadily, and he refuses to get treatment on his own because of a myriad of delusional reasons that, were he, well, sane, he wouldn't actually believe. Three months inpatient care, voluntary or not, would help get his head at least somewhat straight and give him some kind of clarity and a grasp on reality and himself again. But no, no, we gotta respect his wishes to not get help, never mind that him not getting help may very well result in someone's death, be it his or someone else's, never mind that he needs treatment and doesn't actually know it, or believe it. He's a threat to himself but because "suicide" hasn't been mentioned yet, it's nobody's problem.
MAKES PERFECT FUCKING SENSE, RIGHT?
Posts: 30739
Threads: 2127
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:24 pm
Guns guns we need more guns.
Posts: 351
Threads: 24
Joined: March 23, 2014
Reputation:
10
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:27 pm
Posts: 3179
Threads: 197
Joined: February 18, 2012
Reputation:
72
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:29 pm
(May 25, 2014 at 1:59 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: I hope you enjoy more Sandyhook incidents, Creed.
Because America is not going to solve the fundamental problems that enable crime and aggression towards everyone else. It is easy to regulate who purchases firearms and what they do with it and if they are of good character and history to own it.
It is difficult to force someone to pay people a living wage that ensures that they're not desperate or living in an area that continually encourages crime.
It is also difficult, as you have seen, to get health care into common access. If we had so much shit thrown over getting universal healthcare or a shitty approximation thereof, what makes you think that we could solve a whole collection of factors that enable violent crime?
Until then, changing one thing should reduce slightly this problem because we are all too fucking immature to solve a collection of root problems.
I would like to keep guns out of the hands of clearly unstable and immature tools.
I find it funny that you would prefer the opposite.
Dammit, Moros, stop trumping me at realism.
*sighs*
The sad fact of it is, you are right. We both are. This apathetic bloody [no pun intended] country is, as you said, too fucking immature.
Maybe we're just fucked. Maybe these problems I'm talking about...the root analogy I keep using, I'll use it again. Maybe the roots have sunk too deep. And I agree that it's a good idea to cut the stem to at least slow the damn thing down. But all the same, nobody on either side of the aisle in the gun control bitchfest tries to look at the root of the damn problem. If you put controllers and lobbyists together and started the debate not with "Are guns bad?" and instead with "What is causing people to utilize guns to commit these atrocities?" there'd be much more intelligent and productive discourse than what currently exists.
In the meantime I maintain my stance on firearm control; make it harder to obtain firearms, don't let unstable individuals purchase them, and get the ATF to do their fucking jobs in persecuting the illegal firearms trade.
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 2:47 pm
The solution is not to just address psychological issues in favor of letting every wing-nut have a gun. We need to have a two-pronged attack that addresses both issues.
I think part of the problem, however, is that we have substantial outcry about guns but never about the cultural issues. That is why I think Creed does have a valid point.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 6051
Threads: 256
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Shooting in California
May 25, 2014 at 3:30 pm
It's crazy this guy couldn't get a girlfriend, what the fuck. He was young, pretty good lookin, drives a BMW and comes from a rich family in a nice area of america.
He should have just got on internet dating or something. And hopefully his conversation skills were more persuasive than his youtube videos. "I don't understand why you don't find me attractive when I'm magnificent" Doesn't go down very well with girls or anyone for that matter.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
|