The foundations of William L. Craigs "science" proven wrong?
July 24, 2014 at 4:39 pm
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2014 at 4:39 pm by Arthur Dent.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 6:48 am
Thread Rating:
|
The foundations of William L. Craigs "science" proven wrong?
|
|
William Craig has extremely flexible points of view. I'm sure if something is proven wrong it won't upset his worldview but rather he'll embrace something else that proves his God. If God is so mighty, he wouldn't need William Craig to defend him, he could do it himself.
RE: The foundations of William L. Craigs "science" proven wrong?
July 25, 2014 at 12:42 pm
(This post was last modified: July 25, 2014 at 12:49 pm by Endo.)
Quote:And at this point, I'd like to posit that Christians aren't necessarily stupid, they're just incredibly slow at picking up science. Remember that whole Galileo debacle? I'll stick with "stupid," thank you very much. And gullible. If xtians claim some dead jew came back to life for their fucking sins they'll believe anything.
WIlliam Lane Craid, a PhD in Philosophy and he cannot even make a philosophically sound argument for ontology. Pitiful
![]() |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




![[Image: tumblr_n8f4c0zuQE1twxzjco1_1280.png]](https://38.media.tumblr.com/2b3973690a56d1cd20fd3da8cdb87d2c/tumblr_n8f4c0zuQE1twxzjco1_1280.png)