Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 12:02 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should we rescue endangered languages?
#31
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
I wonder what Americans will be speaking (officially, anyhow), in, say 200 years. That's almost a thread in itself. Maybe the USA won't be around as such.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Reply
#32
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
(August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 10, 2014 at 1:15 pm)Marsellus Wallace Wrote: Fuck that shit . Make English the one global language and get this over with . The more standard language is the more practical and efficient we are .

English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.

Boru
It'd be called Chinglish Tongue

There is still a lot of French, Spanish and Arabic. I don't see any of those going anywhere fast, especially arabic, considering how resistant that area of the world appears to be to change.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Reply
#33
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
One of my favourite fictional characters, James Bolivar deGriz, was fond of telling people, 'I speak Esperanto like a native.' Smile

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#34
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
(August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 10, 2014 at 1:15 pm)Marsellus Wallace Wrote: Fuck that shit . Make English the one global language and get this over with . The more standard language is the more practical and efficient we are .

English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.

Boru

Isn't there something called 'Globish' which is a cut-down version of English, 1500 words and 3 tenses, or something like that, which is used in business?
Reply
#35
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
(August 10, 2014 at 1:34 pm)Diablo Wrote:
(August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.

Boru

Isn't there something called 'Globish' which is a cut-down version of English, 1500 words and 3 tenses, or something like that, which is used in business?

I believe so, but I was speaking of a sort of global lingua franca, which would also be the vernacular of most people.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#36
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
(August 10, 2014 at 1:33 pm)Tobie Wrote:
(August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.

Boru
It'd be called Chinglish Tongue

There is still a lot of French, Spanish and Arabic. I don't see any of those going anywhere fast, especially arabic, considering how resistant that area of the world appears to be to change.


Chinese is unsuitable as a global language because:

1. It's writing system does not lend itself to highly efficient machine input.

2. The tonal based sound structure of Chinese makes proper mandarin pronounciation difficult for native speakers of non-tonal languages to master. Furthermore failure to properly master tonal qualities of spoken Chinese often makes the speaker incomprehensible.

3. Chinese is linguistically distant from any other major language family, so natives of no other major language family is given a leg up on learning Chinese by virtue of having mastered their native language.

It should also be noted in East Asian areas where china enjoyed undisputed cultural dominance for many centuries the Chinese writing system proliferated and became the dominant writing system in Vietnam, Korea, and japan, But Chinese language did not follow. Everyone else went on speaking their native languages, only writing them in Chinese characters.
Reply
#37
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
Wow...this thread now reminds me of Firefly. Awesome.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#38
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
It's probably likely that local populations will go on speaking their language and that (probably) English will be used as the second language. As Chuck says, Mandarin is just too difficult. I read somewhere that it takes 18 years to learn properly!

In Barcelona, for example, people speak Catalan at home and Spanish at school.
Reply
#39
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
In my country libya, standard arabic is the official language. It is nobody's mother tongue, our first tongue are the dialects (except the berbers). It's a dead language and they try to make us speak it (libyan dialects aren't considered real, because they're not a written language and they say they lack grammatical rules, which obviously isn't true).
A contributing factor is the fact that the quran was written in classical arabic. One time someone I know said that berber shouldn't be official in their areas because it's not Allah's language.

I mean libyan arabic is easier, it doesn't have case endings, only three yous (the standard has five)... etc.

Anyway how did Europe abandon Latin, and adopted the vernacular?

How do you learn to spell irish (the pronunciation isn't that hard though, check libyan arabic)?

Ps. How good is my English?
Reply
#40
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
(August 14, 2014 at 8:12 am)czúzyt ylgájla Wrote: In my country libya, standard arabic is the official language. It is nobody's mother tongue, our first tongue are the dialects (except the berbers). It's a dead language and they try to make us speak it (libyan dialects aren't considered real, because they're not a written language and they say they lack grammatical rules, which obviously isn't true).
A contributing factor is the fact that the quran was written in classical arabic. One time someone I know said that berber shouldn't be official in their areas because it's not Allah's language.

I mean libyan arabic is easier, it doesn't have case endings, only three yous (the standard has five)... etc.

Anyway how did Europe abandon Latin, and adopted the vernacular?

How do you learn to spell irish (the pronunciation isn't that hard though, check libyan arabic)?

Ps. How good is my English?

It was only the educated people in Europe who could speak latin, and one of the points of the christian reformation was using the languages of the people in church, so in protestant countries, it wasn't used much.

Also, your english is good.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Should I stay or should I go? POLITICAL op/ed Brian37 53 9039 August 26, 2021 at 11:43 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Is preserving languages a good thing? FlatAssembler 21 3239 November 4, 2020 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: Secular Elf
  Attempting to rescue hostages Heywood 15 3636 December 6, 2014 at 3:13 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Donut-fucker pig arrests firefighter in the middle of a rescue. Creed of Heresy 11 4219 February 7, 2014 at 1:03 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Tragic Details Emerge on SEAL Team 6's Fatal Rescue Mission Judas BentHer 12 4090 August 8, 2011 at 2:12 pm
Last Post: Judas BentHer



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)