Posts: 10470
Threads: 165
Joined: May 29, 2013
Reputation:
53
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 1:32 pm
I wonder what Americans will be speaking (officially, anyhow), in, say 200 years. That's almost a thread in itself. Maybe the USA won't be around as such.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Posts: 1298
Threads: 42
Joined: January 2, 2012
Reputation:
32
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 1:33 pm
(August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (August 10, 2014 at 1:15 pm)Marsellus Wallace Wrote: Fuck that shit . Make English the one global language and get this over with . The more standard language is the more practical and efficient we are .
English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.
Boru It'd be called Chinglish
There is still a lot of French, Spanish and Arabic. I don't see any of those going anywhere fast, especially arabic, considering how resistant that area of the world appears to be to change.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Posts: 46104
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 1:34 pm
One of my favourite fictional characters, James Bolivar deGriz, was fond of telling people, 'I speak Esperanto like a native.'
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 656
Threads: 23
Joined: July 25, 2014
Reputation:
7
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 1:34 pm
(August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (August 10, 2014 at 1:15 pm)Marsellus Wallace Wrote: Fuck that shit . Make English the one global language and get this over with . The more standard language is the more practical and efficient we are .
English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.
Boru
Isn't there something called 'Globish' which is a cut-down version of English, 1500 words and 3 tenses, or something like that, which is used in business?
Posts: 46104
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 1:39 pm
(August 10, 2014 at 1:34 pm)Diablo Wrote: (August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.
Boru
Isn't there something called 'Globish' which is a cut-down version of English, 1500 words and 3 tenses, or something like that, which is used in business?
I believe so, but I was speaking of a sort of global lingua franca, which would also be the vernacular of most people.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 3:26 pm
(This post was last modified: August 10, 2014 at 3:30 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 10, 2014 at 1:33 pm)Tobie Wrote: (August 10, 2014 at 1:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: English is (effectively) that already. In 50 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if the global language ('Earthish'? 'Earthean'?) was some sort of Mandarin/English fusion.
Boru It'd be called Chinglish
There is still a lot of French, Spanish and Arabic. I don't see any of those going anywhere fast, especially arabic, considering how resistant that area of the world appears to be to change.
Chinese is unsuitable as a global language because:
1. It's writing system does not lend itself to highly efficient machine input.
2. The tonal based sound structure of Chinese makes proper mandarin pronounciation difficult for native speakers of non-tonal languages to master. Furthermore failure to properly master tonal qualities of spoken Chinese often makes the speaker incomprehensible.
3. Chinese is linguistically distant from any other major language family, so natives of no other major language family is given a leg up on learning Chinese by virtue of having mastered their native language.
It should also be noted in East Asian areas where china enjoyed undisputed cultural dominance for many centuries the Chinese writing system proliferated and became the dominant writing system in Vietnam, Korea, and japan, But Chinese language did not follow. Everyone else went on speaking their native languages, only writing them in Chinese characters.
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 3:53 pm
Wow...this thread now reminds me of Firefly. Awesome.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 656
Threads: 23
Joined: July 25, 2014
Reputation:
7
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 10, 2014 at 3:58 pm
It's probably likely that local populations will go on speaking their language and that (probably) English will be used as the second language. As Chuck says, Mandarin is just too difficult. I read somewhere that it takes 18 years to learn properly!
In Barcelona, for example, people speak Catalan at home and Spanish at school.
Posts: 3680
Threads: 52
Joined: August 13, 2014
Reputation:
19
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 14, 2014 at 8:12 am
In my country libya, standard arabic is the official language. It is nobody's mother tongue, our first tongue are the dialects (except the berbers). It's a dead language and they try to make us speak it (libyan dialects aren't considered real, because they're not a written language and they say they lack grammatical rules, which obviously isn't true).
A contributing factor is the fact that the quran was written in classical arabic. One time someone I know said that berber shouldn't be official in their areas because it's not Allah's language.
I mean libyan arabic is easier, it doesn't have case endings, only three yous (the standard has five)... etc.
Anyway how did Europe abandon Latin, and adopted the vernacular?
How do you learn to spell irish (the pronunciation isn't that hard though, check libyan arabic)?
Ps. How good is my English?
Posts: 1298
Threads: 42
Joined: January 2, 2012
Reputation:
32
RE: Should we rescue endangered languages?
August 14, 2014 at 12:30 pm
(August 14, 2014 at 8:12 am)czúzyt ylgájla Wrote: In my country libya, standard arabic is the official language. It is nobody's mother tongue, our first tongue are the dialects (except the berbers). It's a dead language and they try to make us speak it (libyan dialects aren't considered real, because they're not a written language and they say they lack grammatical rules, which obviously isn't true).
A contributing factor is the fact that the quran was written in classical arabic. One time someone I know said that berber shouldn't be official in their areas because it's not Allah's language.
I mean libyan arabic is easier, it doesn't have case endings, only three yous (the standard has five)... etc.
Anyway how did Europe abandon Latin, and adopted the vernacular?
How do you learn to spell irish (the pronunciation isn't that hard though, check libyan arabic)?
Ps. How good is my English?
It was only the educated people in Europe who could speak latin, and one of the points of the christian reformation was using the languages of the people in church, so in protestant countries, it wasn't used much.
Also, your english is good.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
|