Why knocking is so important.

[pocaracas]

[Thumpalumpacus]

[Simon Moon]

So Drich, some 25 pages later, nothing to say to the accusation that it's all in your head, huh?

I've been asking him the same thing for months. Never a response.


He can not provide one bit of evidence that he is not misinterpreting a natural brain state.

His only argument is circular.

"The Bible makes a claim, that if you follow steps 123, you will get results XYZ. I followed steps 123 and got results XYZ. Therefore, God".

He cannot know that following steps 123 did not cause a natural brain state that he misinterpreted. Which is most likely the case.

[Anomalocaris]

I think the conclusion is he was always an ignorant idiot. But Christianity made him immune to any improvement.

[Lucanus]

SPOILERS: Col. Sanders was a person, the documentation regarding him is reliable and objective and can be verified by a third party.

The absolute same can be said about Jesus.

Oh yes? Then scholars all over the world will be glad to hear your absolute proof of his existence.

The documentation about god is oftentimes vague, imprecise and open to a variety of interpretations. God is your claim, and if you don't show us any objective evidence of him no one's going to change their minds.

There are more documents about Jesus than anyone else of that time period.

If Christ's existance is in question then so too is everyone else who lived then.

You know, SOME PEOPLE burnt books until the ones about Jesus were more than those about everyone else in that time period.

The problem is that you're looking for god but it does not stand up to any scrutiny from a third party.

Again see above.

Still looks like vague metaphors to me.

almost there... just a few more verses.

I'm tired of this charade. If you have bible verses to show me, then show them already.

Also, if you were a honest person, you would address the central point of my argument which is what pocaracas as well has asked of you since about page 5. He's had to restate that because of your (willful?) forgetfulness. We can all see through your shit mate.

[Drich]

[Ravenshire]

What better proof of God than God Himself?

Present him for our inspection and we'll see.

Until then, would you please tell the voices in your head we're not interested in what they have to say? Thanks so much.

[Natachan]

You do know the evidence for Jesus is circumstantial, right? There were a number of people around this time who were apocalyptic prophets around whom cults sprang up. It is likely that The Jesus myth sprang up around one of these figures. And I say "myth" because portions of the gospels are historically not true. And verifiably so. Of course the existence of god has no connection to the veracity of scripture, but if it's your only tool then you're in trouble. You seem unable to provide one piece of independent evidence outside of the gospels and personal subjective experience.

If you believe because you just want to, that's fine. My mom is like that and I respect her more for admitting it. I don't want to stop you from something that works for you, provided you aren't hurting anyone. But please stop with the circular arguments.

[Drich]

What better proof of God than God Himself?

Present him for our inspection and we'll see.

Until then, would you please tell the voices in your head we're not interested in what they have to say? Thanks so much.

Again, God is not some trainned monkey i can produce, to perform on your demand. I have absolutly no say in what God does. That however does not mean you can get an audience with Him. You just have to do things His way. (Think meeting the president or queen or whatever head of state you have.) you have to do it their way on their terms. So why not the God of creation? In short you become the monkey.. Which should suit most of you, just fine.
(evolutionists)
Get it? Monkey/evolutionists??

[Cyberman]

No.